1.Easy
What is the age of criminal responsibility in England and Wales?
- A12
- B16
- C14
- D10
2.Easy
In English law, "voluntary manslaughter" refers to:
- AA killing caused by gross negligence at work
- BA killing caused by an unlawful and dangerous act, without intent to kill
- CA killing with the mens rea for murder where a partial defence applies
- DA killing that the victim consented to in advance
3.Easy
In Dutch criminal law, what distinguishes "moord" (Article 289 Sr) from "doodslag" (Article 287 Sr)?
- AMoord requires premeditation (voorbedachte raad)
- BMoord requires more than one victim
- CMoord can only be committed against a police officer
- DMoord requires the use of a weapon
4.Medium
The "thin skull" rule in criminal law means:
- AThe victim's injuries must be foreseeable in extent
- BOnly healthy victims are protected
- CA frail victim breaks the chain of causation
- DThe defendant must take the victim as they find them
5.Medium
D is present when a crime is committed but does nothing to help or encourage it. Following R v Clarkson, D is:
- AThe principal, because D witnessed the whole crime
- BAn accessory, because D could have called the police
- CAn accessory, because voluntary presence at the scene always amounts to encouragement
- DNot an accessory, because mere presence without intent to encourage is not enough
6.Medium
In English law, the mens rea of murder is:
- ASubjective recklessness as to causing death or serious harm
- BNegligence in causing death
- CIntention to frighten the victim
- DIntention to kill or to cause grievous bodily harm
7.Hard
In "Thabo Meli v R", the defendants beat the victim, believed him dead and threw him off a cliff, where he died of exposure. The court held:
- AThe series of acts formed one transaction, so actus reus and mens rea coincided
- BThe defendants were guilty only of attempted murder
- CThere was no murder because the mens rea existed only before the act that actually caused death
- DThe victim's death was not caused by the defendants
8.Hard
Under the loss of control defence (Coroners and Justice Act 2009), the defence is NOT available if:
- AThe victim was a family member
- BThe loss of control was not sudden
- CThe defendant acted in a considered desire for revenge
- DThe defendant had been drinking that day
Answer key
- 1. D · 10
- 2. C · A killing with the mens rea for murder where a partial defence applies
- 3. A · Moord requires premeditation (voorbedachte raad)
- 4. D · The defendant must take the victim as they find them
- 5. D · Not an accessory, because mere presence without intent to encourage is not enough
- 6. D · Intention to kill or to cause grievous bodily harm
- 7. A · The series of acts formed one transaction, so actus reus and mens rea coincided
- 8. C · The defendant acted in a considered desire for revenge
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.