1.Easy
Automatism as a defence refers to:
- AActing without voluntary control over one's body
- BActing under the influence of strong anger
- CActing in the belief that the act is lawful
- DActing under threats from another person
2.Easy
An attempt to commit a crime means:
- APlanning a crime in detail and buying the equipment needed later to commit it
- BDoing more than merely preparatory acts with intent to commit the offence
- CCommitting the full offence
- DTalking to a friend about a crime
3.Easy
Which two elements usually make up a criminal offence?
- ADuty and breach
- BActus reus and mens rea
- COffer and acceptance
- DMotive and opportunity
4.Medium
The "thin skull" rule in criminal law means:
- AThe defendant must take the victim as they find them
- BOnly healthy victims are protected
- CA frail victim breaks the chain of causation
- DThe victim's injuries must be foreseeable in extent
5.Medium
D takes a college exam paper, reads it and returns it, planning to cheat. Following Oxford v Moss, D did not steal because:
- AD was a student at the college
- BExam papers have no economic value
- CConfidential information is not property under the Theft Act
- DThe paper itself was returned, so there was no intention to deprive
6.Medium
In English law, the test for dishonesty in theft is now set out in:
- AIvey v Genting Casinos
- BR v Ghosh
- CR v Cunningham
- DDonoghue v Stevenson
7.Hard
The principle of "ne bis in idem" means that:
- AAppeals are forbidden
- BEvery crime must be punished twice
- CA person cannot be tried or punished twice for the same offence
- DTwo judges must hear every case
8.Hard
In R v Gullefer (1990), D ran onto a greyhound track to get the race declared void and recover his bet. The Court of Appeal held:
- AAttempt requires the last act before the crime
- BHe was guilty of attempted theft, as running onto the track was more than preparatory
- CImpossibility gave him a complete defence
- DHis acts were merely preparatory, as he had not embarked on the "crime proper"
Answer key
- 1. A · Acting without voluntary control over one's body
- 2. B · Doing more than merely preparatory acts with intent to commit the offence
- 3. B · Actus reus and mens rea
- 4. A · The defendant must take the victim as they find them
- 5. C · Confidential information is not property under the Theft Act
- 6. A · Ivey v Genting Casinos
- 7. C · A person cannot be tried or punished twice for the same offence
- 8. D · His acts were merely preparatory, as he had not embarked on the "crime proper"
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.