1.Easy
A person who helps or encourages another to commit a crime, without carrying out the act themselves, is called:
- AAn innocent agent
- BAn accessory (secondary party)
- CA co-defendant witness
- DA principal offender
2.Easy
In English law, rape is defined in which statute?
- AThe Offences Against the Person Act 1861
- BThe Criminal Justice Act 1988
- CThe Protection from Harassment Act 1997
- DThe Sexual Offences Act 2003
3.Easy
The presumption of innocence means:
- AThe accused is treated as innocent until proven guilty
- BEveryone arrested is guilty
- CThe accused must prove their innocence beyond reasonable doubt
- DJudges cannot convict anyone
4.Medium
D grabs V's handbag so forcefully that V's hand is pulled down. Following R v Clouden, this can be:
- ABurglary, because the bag was V's property
- BOnly battery, because the bag was not taken
- CRobbery, because force was used on the person to steal
- DOnly theft, because there was no direct contact with V's body
5.Medium
In English law, the mens rea of murder is:
- ASubjective recklessness as to causing death or serious harm
- BIntention to kill or to cause grievous bodily harm
- CIntention to frighten the victim
- DNegligence in causing death
6.Medium
D drives on the pavement to escape a man who is threatening to kill him. The most suitable defence is:
- AConsent
- BDuress of circumstances
- CLoss of control
- DDiminished responsibility
7.Hard
In R v Gullefer (1990), D ran onto a greyhound track to get the race declared void and recover his bet. The Court of Appeal held:
- AAttempt requires the last act before the crime
- BImpossibility gave him a complete defence
- CHe was guilty of attempted theft, as running onto the track was more than preparatory
- DHis acts were merely preparatory, as he had not embarked on the "crime proper"
8.Hard
Which statement about "noodweerexces" (excessive self-defence) in Dutch law (Article 41(2) Sr) is correct?
- AThe excess is justified whenever the defender reasonably feared further attacks from the same person later
- BAny excessive force is always justified
- CThe excess is excused if directly caused by a strong emotional disturbance resulting from the attack
- DIt applies only to police officers
Answer key
- 1. B · An accessory (secondary party)
- 2. D · The Sexual Offences Act 2003
- 3. A · The accused is treated as innocent until proven guilty
- 4. C · Robbery, because force was used on the person to steal
- 5. B · Intention to kill or to cause grievous bodily harm
- 6. B · Duress of circumstances
- 7. D · His acts were merely preparatory, as he had not embarked on the "crime proper"
- 8. C · The excess is excused if directly caused by a strong emotional disturbance resulting from the attack
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.