1.Easy
In criminal cases, the prosecution must usually prove guilt:
- AOn the balance of probabilities
- BWith at least three witnesses
- CWith a confession
- DBeyond reasonable doubt
2.Easy
Burglary in English law (section 9 Theft Act 1968) requires that the defendant entered a building or part of a building:
- ABy breaking a lock
- BAs a trespasser
- CAt night time
- DWhile armed
3.Easy
In English law, rape is defined in which statute?
- AThe Offences Against the Person Act 1861
- BThe Sexual Offences Act 2003
- CThe Protection from Harassment Act 1997
- DThe Criminal Justice Act 1988
4.Medium
In English law, the mens rea of murder is:
- AIntention to frighten the victim
- BIntention to kill or to cause grievous bodily harm
- CSubjective recklessness as to causing death or serious harm
- DNegligence in causing death
5.Medium
D takes a college exam paper, reads it and returns it, planning to cheat. Following Oxford v Moss, D did not steal because:
- AConfidential information is not property under the Theft Act
- BThe paper itself was returned, so there was no intention to deprive
- CExam papers have no economic value
- DD was a student at the college
6.Medium
D puts poison in V's drink intending to kill her, but V dies of an unrelated heart attack before the poison works. D is guilty of:
- AAttempted murder
- BNo offence at all
- CManslaughter
- DMurder
7.Hard
Which statement about "noodweerexces" (excessive self-defence) in Dutch law (Article 41(2) Sr) is correct?
- AThe excess is excused if directly caused by a strong emotional disturbance resulting from the attack
- BIt applies only to police officers
- CAny excessive force is always justified
- DThe excess is justified whenever the defender reasonably feared further attacks from the same person later
8.Hard
In R v Jordan (1956), the court held the chain of causation was broken because:
- AThe victim refused a blood transfusion for religious reasons, which was unforeseeable
- BThe victim had an unusually thin skull
- CA second attacker stabbed the victim again in hospital
- DThe medical treatment was "palpably wrong" and the wound had mainly healed
Answer key
- 1. D · Beyond reasonable doubt
- 2. B · As a trespasser
- 3. B · The Sexual Offences Act 2003
- 4. B · Intention to kill or to cause grievous bodily harm
- 5. A · Confidential information is not property under the Theft Act
- 6. A · Attempted murder
- 7. A · The excess is excused if directly caused by a strong emotional disturbance resulting from the attack
- 8. D · The medical treatment was "palpably wrong" and the wound had mainly healed
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.