1.Easy
Self-defence is generally a defence when the force used is:
- APlanned in advance as revenge
- BUsed after the threat has ended
- CNecessary and reasonable in the circumstances
- DAs strong as possible
2.Easy
A person who helps or encourages another to commit a crime, without carrying out the act themselves, is called:
- AAn innocent agent
- BA principal offender
- CA co-defendant witness
- DAn accessory (secondary party)
3.Easy
Under the Criminal Damage Act 1971, criminal damage by fire is charged as:
- AArson
- BAggravated theft
- CAffray
- DBurglary
4.Medium
D makes repeated silent phone calls to V, causing her psychiatric illness. Following R v Ireland, D can be guilty of:
- AAn assault, as silent calls can cause apprehension of immediate force
- BOnly a civil wrong, because no physical harm occurred
- COnly harassment, because no force was used
- DNo offence, because words or silence can never amount to an assault in law
5.Medium
Causation in criminal law requires that the defendant's act was:
- AThe only cause of the result
- BMorally wrong
- CIntended to cause the result in every case
- DA factual and legal cause of the result
6.Medium
During a burglary, D has handed a knife to an accomplice. When someone arrives, D says "come on, let's go" and climbs out; the accomplice stabs the person. Following R v Becerra, D's withdrawal is:
- AEffective, because D left before the crime was completed
- BIrrelevant, because once an accessory has supplied a weapon, no later act of withdrawal can ever relieve them of liability
- CEffective, because any words of withdrawal are always enough
- DNot effective, because withdrawal must be timely and unequivocal and may need more than words once violence is imminent
7.Hard
Gross negligence manslaughter in English law (R v Adomako) requires:
- AA duty of care, breach causing death, and negligence so bad that it should be criminal
- BAn unlawful and dangerous act causing death, judged objectively by sober and reasonable people
- CIntention to kill
- DSubjective recklessness about death
8.Hard
In R v Lloyd (1985), a cinema employee lent films to be copied and returned them within hours. The court held there was no theft because:
- AFilms are intangible property that cannot be stolen
- BCopying films was not illegal at the time
- CThe employee had the cinema's permission to borrow the films for a short time
- DThe films were returned with their "goodness or virtue" not wholly exhausted
Answer key
- 1. C · Necessary and reasonable in the circumstances
- 2. D · An accessory (secondary party)
- 3. A · Arson
- 4. A · An assault, as silent calls can cause apprehension of immediate force
- 5. D · A factual and legal cause of the result
- 6. D · Not effective, because withdrawal must be timely and unequivocal and may need more than words once violence is imminent
- 7. A · A duty of care, breach causing death, and negligence so bad that it should be criminal
- 8. D · The films were returned with their "goodness or virtue" not wholly exhausted
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.