1.Easy
In English law, "voluntary manslaughter" refers to:
- AA killing with the mens rea for murder where a partial defence applies
- BA killing caused by an unlawful and dangerous act, without intent to kill
- CA killing that the victim consented to in advance
- DA killing caused by gross negligence at work
2.Easy
Necessity was rejected as a defence to murder in the famous shipwreck case of:
- AR v Collins
- BR v Miller
- CR v Brown
- DR v Dudley and Stephens
3.Easy
In English law, which court tries the most serious (indictable-only) offences such as murder?
- AThe magistrates' court
- BThe Crown Court
- CThe Court of Appeal
- DThe county court
4.Medium
D swaps price labels on two items in a supermarket, intending to pay the lower price. Following R v Morris, the appropriation took place when D:
- ALeft the shop without paying
- BPaid at the checkout
- CPut the item in the trolley
- DSwitched the labels, assuming one of the owner's rights
5.Medium
D takes a college exam paper, reads it and returns it, planning to cheat. Following Oxford v Moss, D did not steal because:
- AConfidential information is not property under the Theft Act
- BThe paper itself was returned, so there was no intention to deprive
- CD was a student at the college
- DExam papers have no economic value
6.Medium
D puts poison in V's drink intending to kill her, but V dies of an unrelated heart attack before the poison works. D is guilty of:
- ANo offence at all
- BAttempted murder
- CMurder
- DManslaughter
7.Hard
In R v Roberts (1971), a woman jumped from a moving car to escape a sexual assault and was injured. The court held the defendant liable unless her reaction was:
- AMore dangerous than staying in the car
- BCaused by her own panic and fear
- CTaken without first asking the defendant to stop the car and let her out
- DSo "daft" or unexpected that no reasonable person could have foreseen it
8.Hard
In Airedale NHS Trust v Bland (1993), the House of Lords held that withdrawing life-sustaining treatment from a patient in a persistent vegetative state:
- AWas lawful because the patient had made an advance decision
- BWas a positive act of killing, amounting to murder
- CWas lawful only because the patient's family had given consent, which is required for any such withdrawal
- DWas an omission that was lawful because continued treatment was no longer in the patient's best interests
Answer key
- 1. A · A killing with the mens rea for murder where a partial defence applies
- 2. D · R v Dudley and Stephens
- 3. B · The Crown Court
- 4. D · Switched the labels, assuming one of the owner's rights
- 5. A · Confidential information is not property under the Theft Act
- 6. B · Attempted murder
- 7. D · So "daft" or unexpected that no reasonable person could have foreseen it
- 8. D · Was an omission that was lawful because continued treatment was no longer in the patient's best interests
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.