1.Easy
In English law, which court tries the most serious (indictable-only) offences such as murder?
- AThe Crown Court
- BThe Court of Appeal
- CThe county court
- DThe magistrates' court
2.Easy
In English law, theft is defined in section 1 of the Theft Act 1968 as:
- AUsing force to obtain property belonging to another person
- BDishonestly appropriating property belonging to another with intention to permanently deprive the other of it
- CBorrowing property from another person without asking first
- DDishonestly taking property belonging to another without consent, with intention to use it and later return it
3.Easy
The principle "nullum crimen sine lege" means that:
- AJudges can create new crimes freely
- BThere is no crime without a law defining it beforehand
- CLaws apply retroactively
- DAll crimes are punished with prison
4.Medium
D drives on the pavement to escape a man who is threatening to kill him. The most suitable defence is:
- ALoss of control
- BDuress of circumstances
- CDiminished responsibility
- DConsent
5.Medium
D, carrying an imitation gun and a threatening note, walks towards a post office to rob it but is arrested outside before entering. Under the Criminal Attempts Act 1981, D is most likely guilty of:
- ABurglary, because D intended to enter the building
- BRobbery, because the intention was proved
- CAttempted robbery, because D was carrying an imitation gun and a threatening note
- DNothing as attempted robbery yet, because D has not gone beyond preparation
6.Medium
"Dolus eventualis" (voorwaardelijk opzet) in Dutch criminal law means the defendant:
- AWanted the consequence as their main goal and acted in order to bring it about
- BKnowingly accepted the considerable chance that the consequence would occur
- CActed entirely by accident
- DDid not foresee the consequence at all
7.Hard
In R v Lloyd (1985), a cinema employee lent films to be copied and returned them within hours. The court held there was no theft because:
- AThe employee had the cinema's permission to borrow the films for a short time
- BThe films were returned with their "goodness or virtue" not wholly exhausted
- CCopying films was not illegal at the time
- DFilms are intangible property that cannot be stolen
8.Hard
Why is the principle of "lex certa" important in criminal law?
- ALaws must be certain to be enforced, so the police have no discretion in applying them
- BCriminal laws must be clear enough for people to foresee what is punishable
- COnly certain crimes can be prosecuted
- DJudges must be certain before sentencing
Answer key
- 1. A · The Crown Court
- 2. B · Dishonestly appropriating property belonging to another with intention to permanently deprive the other of it
- 3. B · There is no crime without a law defining it beforehand
- 4. B · Duress of circumstances
- 5. D · Nothing as attempted robbery yet, because D has not gone beyond preparation
- 6. B · Knowingly accepted the considerable chance that the consequence would occur
- 7. B · The films were returned with their "goodness or virtue" not wholly exhausted
- 8. B · Criminal laws must be clear enough for people to foresee what is punishable
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.