1.Easy
Which Act provides the statutory framework for reasonable force in self-defence and householder cases in England and Wales?
- AThe Sexual Offences Act 2003
- BThe Human Rights Act 1998
- CThe Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
- DThe Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008
2.Easy
Under section 2 of the Homicide Act 1957, who bears the burden of proving diminished responsibility?
- ANobody, as the jury decides freely
- BThe defendant, on the balance of probabilities
- CThe judge, on the medical evidence alone
- DThe prosecution, beyond reasonable doubt
3.Easy
In English law, "voluntary manslaughter" refers to:
- AA killing with the mens rea for murder where a partial defence applies
- BA killing caused by an unlawful and dangerous act, without intent to kill
- CA killing that the victim consented to in advance
- DA killing caused by gross negligence at work
4.Medium
D takes his own car from a garage without paying for repairs. Following R v Turner (No 2), D can be guilty of theft because:
- AProperty belongs to anyone who has possession or control of it
- BD intended to return the car later
- COwners who take back their own property are always acting dishonestly
- DThe car was worth more after the repairs
5.Medium
Strict liability offences are offences where:
- ALiability arises only if the defendant was negligent as to every element
- BNo mens rea is required for at least one element of the actus reus
- CThe defendant must confess
- DOnly intentional acts count
6.Medium
D makes repeated silent phone calls to V, causing her psychiatric illness. Following R v Ireland, D can be guilty of:
- AOnly harassment, because no force was used
- BAn assault, as silent calls can cause apprehension of immediate force
- COnly a civil wrong, because no physical harm occurred
- DNo offence, because words or silence can never amount to an assault in law
7.Hard
In R v Cheshire, the court held that negligent medical treatment of a gunshot victim:
- AMakes the doctors liable for murder
- BDid not break the chain of causation unless it was so independent and potent that the original wound became insignificant
- CBroke the chain of causation whenever it was negligent enough to be the immediate medical cause of death, even if the wound still operated
- DAlways breaks the chain of causation
8.Hard
In R v Whybrow (1951), the court held that the mens rea of attempted murder is:
- AAn intention to cause GBH
- BThe same as the mens rea of murder
- CRecklessness as to causing death
- DAn intention to kill only
Answer key
- 1. D · The Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008
- 2. B · The defendant, on the balance of probabilities
- 3. A · A killing with the mens rea for murder where a partial defence applies
- 4. A · Property belongs to anyone who has possession or control of it
- 5. B · No mens rea is required for at least one element of the actus reus
- 6. B · An assault, as silent calls can cause apprehension of immediate force
- 7. B · Did not break the chain of causation unless it was so independent and potent that the original wound became insignificant
- 8. D · An intention to kill only
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.