1.Easy
The principle "nullum crimen sine lege" means that:
- AAll crimes are punished with prison
- BJudges can create new crimes freely
- CLaws apply retroactively
- DThere is no crime without a law defining it beforehand
2.Easy
Automatism as a defence refers to:
- AActing under threats from another person
- BActing without voluntary control over one's body
- CActing under the influence of strong anger
- DActing in the belief that the act is lawful
3.Easy
Which two elements usually make up a criminal offence?
- AMotive and opportunity
- BDuty and breach
- COffer and acceptance
- DActus reus and mens rea
4.Medium
D takes his own car from a garage without paying for repairs. Following R v Turner (No 2), D can be guilty of theft because:
- AThe car was worth more after the repairs
- BProperty belongs to anyone who has possession or control of it
- COwners who take back their own property are always acting dishonestly
- DD intended to return the car later
5.Medium
Two adult friends agree to a fist fight in the street, and one breaks the other's nose. Following A-G's Reference (No 6 of 1980), consent is:
- AA full defence, because both adults freely agreed to the fight and accepted the risk of injury
- BRelevant only to the sentence and never to guilt
- CNo defence, because a street fight causing actual bodily harm is not in the public interest
- DA defence only if the fight was planned in advance
6.Medium
D drives on the pavement to escape a man who is threatening to kill him. The most suitable defence is:
- AConsent
- BDiminished responsibility
- CDuress of circumstances
- DLoss of control
7.Hard
In Sweet v Parsley (1970), a landlady was convicted of being concerned in the management of premises used for smoking cannabis. The House of Lords:
- AHeld that cannabis offences require a commercial purpose
- BHeld that landladies have a duty to search their tenants
- CUpheld the conviction because drug offences are always strict liability in order to protect public health
- DQuashed the conviction, holding that mens rea is presumed unless Parliament clearly excludes it
8.Hard
In English law, the partial defence of loss of control reduces murder to:
- AGrievous bodily harm
- BVoluntary manslaughter
- CAn acquittal
- DInvoluntary manslaughter
Answer key
- 1. D · There is no crime without a law defining it beforehand
- 2. B · Acting without voluntary control over one's body
- 3. D · Actus reus and mens rea
- 4. B · Property belongs to anyone who has possession or control of it
- 5. C · No defence, because a street fight causing actual bodily harm is not in the public interest
- 6. C · Duress of circumstances
- 7. D · Quashed the conviction, holding that mens rea is presumed unless Parliament clearly excludes it
- 8. B · Voluntary manslaughter
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.