1.Easy
What is the time limit for bringing an action for annulment under Article 263 TFEU?
- ATwo years
- BTwo months
- CTwo weeks
- DSix months
2.Easy
Under Article 288 TFEU, an EU decision is:
- ABinding only as to the result to be achieved by each state
- BBinding in its entirety, and on those to whom it is addressed if it names addressees
- CBinding only after approval by national parliaments
- DA non-binding statement of the institution's opinion addressed to member states or individuals
3.Easy
What is the main task of the European Court of Auditors?
- AHearing appeals against national court judgments
- BExamining the EU's accounts and checking that its revenue and spending are lawful and sound
- CSetting interest rates for the euro area
- DDrafting the EU's annual budget proposal and presenting it to the European Parliament for approval
4.Medium
In Foto-Frost (1987), the Court held that national courts:
- ACan freely declare EU acts invalid
- BMust apply EU acts even if the Court of Justice has already declared them invalid
- CCannot declare an EU act invalid themselves and must refer the question
- DCannot refer validity questions to the Court of Justice
5.Medium
Under Article 51 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, the Charter binds member states:
- AOnly when their constitution allows it
- BIn all their activities, including purely national matters
- COnly when they are implementing EU law
- DNever, as it binds only the EU institutions
6.Medium
Environmental policy is an example of which type of EU competence?
- AExclusive competence
- BShared competence
- CNo EU competence at all
- DSupporting competence
7.Hard
In R v Henn and Darby (1979), a UK ban on importing pornographic material was held to be:
- AOutside Article 34 because it concerned only books
- BJustified on grounds of public morality under Article 36
- CUnjustified because the UK allowed some domestic pornography
- DA customs duty contrary to Article 30
8.Hard
In Plaumann (1963), a clementine importer challenged a Commission decision addressed to Germany. The Court held that a non-addressee is individually concerned only if:
- AThe act affects them because of attributes or circumstances that distinguish them from all other persons
- BThey suffer a financial loss from the act
- CThey have written to the Commission before the act
- DThey belong to the economic sector affected and carry on the commercial activity that the act regulates, like any other importer
Answer key
- 1. B · Two months
- 2. B · Binding in its entirety, and on those to whom it is addressed if it names addressees
- 3. B · Examining the EU's accounts and checking that its revenue and spending are lawful and sound
- 4. C · Cannot declare an EU act invalid themselves and must refer the question
- 5. C · Only when they are implementing EU law
- 6. B · Shared competence
- 7. B · Justified on grounds of public morality under Article 36
- 8. A · The act affects them because of attributes or circumstances that distinguish them from all other persons
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.