1.Easy
Article 107 TFEU generally prohibits:
- ADiscrimination against workers and service providers from other member states
- BAgreements between companies that fix prices
- CCustoms duties on imports from other member states
- DState aid that distorts competition and affects trade between member states
2.Easy
What is the role of an Advocate General at the Court of Justice?
- ATo prosecute member states that break EU law on behalf of the European Commission
- BTo represent the EU institutions in court
- CTo defend individuals who cannot afford a lawyer
- DTo give an independent, reasoned opinion on cases before the Court decides
3.Easy
The Schengen area mainly concerns:
- AThe common rules on competition between companies
- BThe abolition of checks on persons at internal borders
- CThe election of the European Parliament
- DThe use of the euro as a single currency
4.Medium
Internationale Handelsgesellschaft (1970) held that the validity of a Community measure:
- ACannot be affected by claims that it breaches national constitutional rights
- BCan be reviewed by any national court that doubts it
- CRequires approval by a national referendum
- DDepends on its compatibility with the fundamental rights in each national constitution
5.Medium
In Ratti (1979), the Court held that an individual could NOT rely on a directive against the state:
- ABefore the transposition deadline had expired
- BIf the member state had failed to transpose it
- CAfter the transposition deadline had expired
- DIf the directive was clear and unconditional
6.Medium
In Foster v British Gas (1990), the Court held that a directive can be relied on against a body that is:
- AAny large company with more than 500 employees
- BOwned by private shareholders but regulated by law
- CAny private body that receives a public contract from the state, whatever its powers or functions
- DMade responsible by the state for a public service under its control, with special powers
7.Hard
In Opinion 2/13 (2014), the Court of Justice held that the draft agreement on EU accession to the ECHR:
- AWas compatible with the Treaties, provided the Council approved it unanimously after consulting Parliament
- BWas unnecessary because the EU had already acceded
- CWas incompatible with the Treaties, in part because it threatened the autonomy of EU law
- DCould only be ratified by a referendum in each state
8.Hard
In Säger v Dennemeyer (1991), the Court held that Article 56 TFEU requires the abolition of:
- AOnly rules that openly discriminate on grounds of nationality
- BAll national licensing requirements, without exception, even where they protect service recipients and are applied proportionately
- COnly rules adopted after the provider has arrived
- DAny restriction, even if non-discriminatory, liable to prohibit or impede the services of a provider from another member state
Answer key
- 1. D · State aid that distorts competition and affects trade between member states
- 2. D · To give an independent, reasoned opinion on cases before the Court decides
- 3. B · The abolition of checks on persons at internal borders
- 4. A · Cannot be affected by claims that it breaches national constitutional rights
- 5. A · Before the transposition deadline had expired
- 6. D · Made responsible by the state for a public service under its control, with special powers
- 7. C · Was incompatible with the Treaties, in part because it threatened the autonomy of EU law
- 8. D · Any restriction, even if non-discriminatory, liable to prohibit or impede the services of a provider from another member state
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.