1.Easy
Where is the European Central Bank based?
- AParis
- BBrussels
- CFrankfurt am Main
- DLuxembourg
2.Easy
Which treaty created the European Union and introduced EU citizenship?
- AThe Single European Act
- BThe Treaty of Rome
- CThe Maastricht Treaty
- DThe Treaty of Amsterdam
3.Easy
The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU has the same legal value as the Treaties since:
- AThe Treaty of Lisbon (2009)
- BThe Treaty of Rome (1957)
- CThe Brexit agreement (2020)
- DThe Maastricht Treaty (1993)
4.Medium
In Brasserie du Pêcheur and Factortame III (1996), the Court held that state liability:
- ARequires proof that the state acted intentionally
- BNever applies to acts of a national parliament
- CCan arise from acts of the national legislature, if the breach is sufficiently serious
- DOnly arises from failure to transpose a directive, not from other acts of the national legislature
5.Medium
A member state grants a subsidy to a company without notifying the Commission. Under the state aid rules, the state:
- AMust pay a fine to every competitor
- BMust obtain approval from the European Parliament afterwards to legalise the aid
- CHas acted lawfully if the subsidy was small in its view
- DBreached the standstill obligation and may be required to recover the aid
6.Medium
According to Gebhard (1995), what mainly distinguishes establishment from the provision of services?
- AServices can only be provided by employees
- BEstablishment always requires forming a company
- CServices are provided only through a permanent office or branch in the host member state
- DEstablishment involves activity on a stable and continuous basis in the host state
7.Hard
In the Factortame litigation, the CJEU held that national courts must:
- AApply national statutes until the national parliament itself repeals any rule that conflicts with EU law
- BRefer the case to the European Court of Human Rights
- CBe able to grant interim relief setting aside a national rule that may breach EU law
- DWait for Parliament to amend the statute first
8.Hard
In Säger v Dennemeyer (1991), the Court held that Article 56 TFEU requires the abolition of:
- AAll national licensing requirements, without exception, even where they protect service recipients and are applied proportionately
- BAny restriction, even if non-discriminatory, liable to prohibit or impede the services of a provider from another member state
- COnly rules that openly discriminate on grounds of nationality
- DOnly rules adopted after the provider has arrived
Answer key
- 1. C · Frankfurt am Main
- 2. C · The Maastricht Treaty
- 3. A · The Treaty of Lisbon (2009)
- 4. C · Can arise from acts of the national legislature, if the breach is sufficiently serious
- 5. D · Breached the standstill obligation and may be required to recover the aid
- 6. D · Establishment involves activity on a stable and continuous basis in the host state
- 7. C · Be able to grant interim relief setting aside a national rule that may breach EU law
- 8. B · Any restriction, even if non-discriminatory, liable to prohibit or impede the services of a provider from another member state
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.