1.Easy
Under the Lisbon rules, a qualified majority in the Council normally requires:
- AAll member states except one
- BA simple majority of member states, provided they represent at least half of the EU population
- CAt least 55% of member states representing at least 65% of the EU population
- DTwo-thirds of member states and half of the population
2.Easy
Which EU court hears most direct actions brought by individuals and companies at first instance?
- AThe General Court
- BThe Court of Justice
- CThe Court of Auditors
- DThe European Court of Human Rights
3.Easy
Under Article 288 TFEU, an EU decision is:
- ABinding only after approval by national parliaments
- BBinding in its entirety, and on those to whom it is addressed if it names addressees
- CBinding only as to the result to be achieved by each state
- DA non-binding statement of the institution's opinion addressed to member states or individuals
4.Medium
Article 34 TFEU prohibits:
- AState aid to companies
- BDiscrimination based on nationality in employment and the provision of services between member states
- CQuantitative restrictions on imports and measures having equivalent effect between member states
- DCartels between undertakings
5.Medium
In Lawrie-Blum (1986), the Court defined a "worker" under Article 45 TFEU as a person who:
- APerforms services for and under the direction of another in return for remuneration
- BEarns at least the national minimum wage for a year
- CHolds a permanent full-time contract of employment registered with the authorities of the host member state
- DIs registered with a national trade union
6.Medium
In Van Binsbergen (1974), a Dutch rule requiring legal representatives to reside in the Netherlands was examined. The Court held that:
- ALegal services are outside the scope of the Treaty
- BOnly regulations can create rights for service providers
- CMember states may always require residence for professionals involved in the administration of justice
- DThe freedom to provide services is directly effective and residence requirements need justification
7.Hard
EU citizenship case law (Zambrano) established that a third-country national parent of a child who is an EU citizen may have a right of residence when:
- ARefusal would deprive the child of the genuine enjoyment of the substance of EU citizenship rights
- BThe parent has lived lawfully in the child's member state for at least five years before applying for residence
- CThe child is older than 18
- DThe parent pays a residence fee
8.Hard
In Åkerberg Fransson (2013), a Swedish fisherman faced tax penalties and criminal proceedings for VAT fraud. The Court held that the Charter applied because:
- AThe national measures fell within the scope of EU law on VAT and the EU's financial interests
- BThe Charter applies to every action of a member state, whether or not it involves EU law in any way
- CSweden had incorporated the Charter into its constitution
- DThe fisherman was an EU institution employee
Answer key
- 1. C · At least 55% of member states representing at least 65% of the EU population
- 2. A · The General Court
- 3. B · Binding in its entirety, and on those to whom it is addressed if it names addressees
- 4. C · Quantitative restrictions on imports and measures having equivalent effect between member states
- 5. A · Performs services for and under the direction of another in return for remuneration
- 6. D · The freedom to provide services is directly effective and residence requirements need justification
- 7. A · Refusal would deprive the child of the genuine enjoyment of the substance of EU citizenship rights
- 8. A · The national measures fell within the scope of EU law on VAT and the EU's financial interests
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.