1.Easy
Who represents the member state governments in EU law-making?
- AThe European Parliament
- BThe Council of the EU
- CThe Court of Auditors
- DThe European Commission
2.Easy
Which treaty, signed in 1957, established the European Economic Community?
- AThe Treaty of Rome
- BThe Treaty of Nice
- CThe Treaty of Paris
- DThe Treaty of Maastricht
3.Easy
How is the President of the European Commission chosen?
- AProposed by the European Council by qualified majority, then elected by the European Parliament
- BElected directly by EU citizens in a separate vote
- CAppointed by the Court of Justice
- DChosen by the outgoing Commission
4.Medium
In United Brands (1978), the Court defined a dominant position as:
- AAny market share above 25% in a member state
- BA position of economic strength enabling an undertaking to prevent effective competition and act independently
- CHolding a market share of more than 40% in a substantial part of the internal market, whatever the competitors' strength
- DBeing the oldest company in a market
5.Medium
Which article of the TFEU prohibits anti-competitive agreements between undertakings?
- AArticle 107
- BArticle 102
- CArticle 101
- DArticle 45
6.Medium
The preliminary reference procedure under Article 267 TFEU allows:
- ANational courts to ask the CJEU questions on the interpretation or validity of EU law
- BThe Parliament to dismiss judges
- CIndividuals to bring actions against member states directly before the Court of Justice in Luxembourg
- DThe Commission to fine member states
7.Hard
In Aranyosi and Căldăraru (2016), the Court held that a judicial authority executing a European Arrest Warrant:
- AMust ask the European Court of Human Rights for permission
- BMust always surrender the person, whatever the prison conditions
- CMay postpone surrender if there is a real risk of inhuman or degrading detention conditions for that person
- DCan refuse any warrant from a state it distrusts in general
8.Hard
In AKZO (1991), the Court of Justice stated that a market share of 50% or more:
- AIs irrelevant to the assessment of dominance
- BIs required before any investigation of dominance
- CCan in itself be evidence of a dominant position, in the absence of exceptional circumstances
- DIs automatically an abuse of a dominant position, without any further analysis being needed by the Commission
Answer key
- 1. B · The Council of the EU
- 2. A · The Treaty of Rome
- 3. A · Proposed by the European Council by qualified majority, then elected by the European Parliament
- 4. B · A position of economic strength enabling an undertaking to prevent effective competition and act independently
- 5. C · Article 101
- 6. A · National courts to ask the CJEU questions on the interpretation or validity of EU law
- 7. C · May postpone surrender if there is a real risk of inhuman or degrading detention conditions for that person
- 8. C · Can in itself be evidence of a dominant position, in the absence of exceptional circumstances
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.