1.Easy
The Schengen area mainly concerns:
- AThe abolition of checks on persons at internal borders
- BThe election of the European Parliament
- CThe use of the euro as a single currency
- DThe common rules on competition between companies
2.Easy
How is the President of the European Commission chosen?
- AElected directly by EU citizens in a separate vote
- BProposed by the European Council by qualified majority, then elected by the European Parliament
- CAppointed by the Court of Justice
- DChosen by the outgoing Commission
3.Easy
Where is the European Central Bank based?
- ALuxembourg
- BParis
- CFrankfurt am Main
- DBrussels
4.Medium
An agreement caught by Article 101(1) TFEU may be exempted under Article 101(3) if, among other conditions, it:
- AIs notified to and approved by the Commission or the national competition authority in advance
- BHas been in operation for more than five years
- CInvolves companies with combined market shares over 50%
- DImproves production or distribution and allows consumers a fair share of the benefit
5.Medium
The "public service" exception in Article 45(4) TFEU covers:
- AAll jobs in the public sector, including those of nurses, teachers and railway workers employed by the state
- BAny job paid for by public funds
- CJobs in companies that have government contracts
- DPosts involving the exercise of public power and safeguarding the general interests of the state
6.Medium
Under the subsidiarity protocol, a "yellow card" is triggered when reasoned opinions represent at least:
- AAll national parliaments
- BTwo member state governments
- CA simple majority of the votes of the Members of the European Parliament
- DOne third of the votes allocated to national parliaments
7.Hard
In Säger v Dennemeyer (1991), the Court held that Article 56 TFEU requires the abolition of:
- AOnly rules that openly discriminate on grounds of nationality
- BOnly rules adopted after the provider has arrived
- CAll national licensing requirements, without exception, even where they protect service recipients and are applied proportionately
- DAny restriction, even if non-discriminatory, liable to prohibit or impede the services of a provider from another member state
8.Hard
In Grzelczyk (2001), a French student in Belgium was refused a minimum subsistence allowance. The Court held:
- AOnly workers may claim social benefits in a host state
- BThe allowance was outside EU law entirely
- CStudents have no rights under EU law in a host state
- DUnion citizenship is destined to be the fundamental status of nationals, so he could not be refused it on grounds of nationality
Answer key
- 1. A · The abolition of checks on persons at internal borders
- 2. B · Proposed by the European Council by qualified majority, then elected by the European Parliament
- 3. C · Frankfurt am Main
- 4. D · Improves production or distribution and allows consumers a fair share of the benefit
- 5. D · Posts involving the exercise of public power and safeguarding the general interests of the state
- 6. D · One third of the votes allocated to national parliaments
- 7. D · Any restriction, even if non-discriminatory, liable to prohibit or impede the services of a provider from another member state
- 8. D · Union citizenship is destined to be the fundamental status of nationals, so he could not be refused it on grounds of nationality
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.