1.Easy
The European Ombudsman investigates complaints about:
- AHuman rights violations by member states
- BBreaches of EU law by private companies
- CMaladministration by EU institutions and bodies
- DCrimes committed by EU citizens
2.Easy
Under Article 20 TFEU, who is a citizen of the European Union?
- AEvery person holding the nationality of a member state
- BEvery person living legally in the EU for five years
- CEvery person born on EU territory
- DEvery person who works in an EU member state
3.Easy
Under Article 288 TFEU, recommendations and opinions:
- AAre binding on all member states
- BHave no binding force
- CBecome binding after five years
- DBind only the Commission
4.Medium
In Foster v British Gas (1990), the Court held that a directive can be relied on against a body that is:
- AAny private body that receives a public contract from the state, whatever its powers or functions
- BMade responsible by the state for a public service under its control, with special powers
- CAny large company with more than 500 employees
- DOwned by private shareholders but regulated by law
5.Medium
Article 34 TFEU prohibits:
- ACartels between undertakings
- BQuantitative restrictions on imports and measures having equivalent effect between member states
- CDiscrimination based on nationality in employment and the provision of services between member states
- DState aid to companies
6.Medium
In Foto-Frost (1987), the Court held that national courts:
- ACannot declare an EU act invalid themselves and must refer the question
- BCannot refer validity questions to the Court of Justice
- CMust apply EU acts even if the Court of Justice has already declared them invalid
- DCan freely declare EU acts invalid
7.Hard
In Rottmann (2010), Germany withdrew a naturalisation obtained by deception, leaving the person stateless. The Court held:
- AThe withdrawal fell within the scope of EU law and had to respect the principle of proportionality
- BThe person automatically regained his previous nationality
- CMember states can never withdraw nationality once granted if doing so would make the person stateless
- DNationality is purely national, so EU law is irrelevant
8.Hard
In Dano (2014), the Court held that an economically inactive EU national with no sufficient resources:
- AHad to be granted permanent residence after one year
- BHad an absolute right to social assistance on the same terms as nationals, by virtue of Union citizenship alone
- CCould be refused social assistance because she did not meet the residence conditions of Directive 2004/38
- DCould be expelled automatically without any assessment
Answer key
- 1. C · Maladministration by EU institutions and bodies
- 2. A · Every person holding the nationality of a member state
- 3. B · Have no binding force
- 4. B · Made responsible by the state for a public service under its control, with special powers
- 5. B · Quantitative restrictions on imports and measures having equivalent effect between member states
- 6. A · Cannot declare an EU act invalid themselves and must refer the question
- 7. A · The withdrawal fell within the scope of EU law and had to respect the principle of proportionality
- 8. C · Could be refused social assistance because she did not meet the residence conditions of Directive 2004/38
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.