1.Easy
Under section 1 of the Defamation Act 2013, a statement is not defamatory unless:
- AThe claimant has lost money because of it
- BIt was published in a newspaper or online
- CIt has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to the claimant's reputation
- DThe defendant intended to harm the claimant or was reckless as to whether it would
2.Easy
In English law, is there a general duty to rescue a stranger in danger?
- ANo, unless the stranger asks for help
- BYes, everyone must try to rescue anyone in danger
- CYes, but only for trained professionals
- DNo, there is generally no liability for a pure omission
3.Easy
In general, a person who hires an independent contractor is:
- ALiable only if the contractor has no insurance
- BNot vicariously liable for the contractor's torts
- CAlways vicariously liable for the contractor's torts
- DLiable for all torts committed in the same year
4.Medium
Heat from a neighbour's ordinary activity damages specially sensitive paper stored by the claimant, but would not harm ordinary paper. Under Robinson v Kilvert, the claim:
- ASucceeds, because the paper was valuable
- BFails, because nuisance does not protect abnormally sensitive uses
- CFails, because heat cannot be a nuisance
- DSucceeds, because any physical damage to goods is an actionable nuisance
5.Medium
Strict liability means a defendant can be liable:
- AWithout proof of fault
- BOnly for criminal acts
- COnly if they broke a contract
- DOnly if they acted intentionally
6.Medium
A house is built on defective foundations, approved by the local authority. Cracks appear and the owner sells at a loss. In Murphy v Brentwood DC, the loss was:
- APure economic loss, not recoverable in negligence
- BRecoverable only against the buyer
- CRecoverable because the council approved the plans
- DPhysical damage, fully recoverable
7.Hard
A surveyor values a modest house for a mortgage lender, knowing the buyer will rely on it. The report is negligent and contains a disclaimer. In Smith v Eric S Bush, the House of Lords held:
- AThe lender alone could sue the surveyor
- BThe surveyor owed no duty, because the buyer was not the client who commissioned the report
- CThe disclaimer excluded all liability to the buyer
- DThe surveyor owed a duty to the buyer, and the disclaimer failed the reasonableness test
8.Hard
In Hedley Byrne v Heller, liability for negligent misstatement arose because:
- AThere was a contract between the parties under which the bank was paid a fee for the reference it gave
- BThe defendant intended to deceive
- CThe statement caused physical injury
- DThere was a special relationship in which the claimant reasonably relied on advice given with skill
Answer key
- 1. C · It has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to the claimant's reputation
- 2. D · No, there is generally no liability for a pure omission
- 3. B · Not vicariously liable for the contractor's torts
- 4. B · Fails, because nuisance does not protect abnormally sensitive uses
- 5. A · Without proof of fault
- 6. A · Pure economic loss, not recoverable in negligence
- 7. D · The surveyor owed a duty to the buyer, and the disclaimer failed the reasonableness test
- 8. D · There was a special relationship in which the claimant reasonably relied on advice given with skill
Full step-by-step solutions: practise this topic on examproblems.com.