Introduction to Law: cram pack

Formula sheets, the key method steps for every topic and 10 practice problems, with full solutions at the back.

New problemsBack to the course

In the print window, choose “Save as PDF” to keep a copy on your device.

1Practice problems

1.Contract lawMedium

Damages for breach of contract are generally meant to:

  1. AReturn both parties only to the position they were in before the contract was made
  2. BGive the innocent party a profit beyond their loss
  3. CPunish the party in breach
  4. DPut the innocent party in the position as if the contract had been performed
2.Contract lawHard

A van is bought "on hire-purchase terms" with no further detail, and such terms varied widely in practice. In Scammell v Ouston, the House of Lords held:

  1. AThe seller's usual terms applied
  2. BThere was a contract on the standard hire-purchase terms of the market
  3. CThere was a contract at a reasonable price
  4. DThere was no contract, because the terms were too vague
3.Tort lawMedium

Under Dutch law, the general provision for liability for unlawful acts (onrechtmatige daad) is:

  1. AArticle 7:17 BW
  2. BArticle 6:162 BW
  3. CArticle 3:40 BW
  4. DArticle 1 of the Constitution
4.Tort lawHard

A bank requires job applicants to have medical examinations by a self-employed doctor, who abuses some of them. In Barclays Bank v Various Claimants (2020), the Supreme Court held the bank:

  1. AStrictly liable for any harm to applicants
  2. BNot vicariously liable, as the doctor was an independent contractor running his own business
  3. CVicariously liable, as the relationship was akin to employment and the bank benefited from his work
  4. DVicariously liable, because it chose the doctor
5.Constitutional lawMedium

Proportionality review usually asks whether a measure:

  1. AIs popular with voters
  2. BPursues a legitimate aim, is suitable, necessary and balanced
  3. CWas adopted quickly
  4. DIs the cheapest option available and has been approved by parliament
6.Constitutional lawHard

In R v Home Secretary, ex p Simms, Lord Hoffmann explained the "principle of legality" as meaning that:

  1. AParliament cannot legislate against fundamental rights
  2. BCourts may strike down Acts that breach fundamental rights
  3. CGeneral words in a statute are presumed not to override fundamental rights
  4. DMinisters may limit fundamental rights whenever it is in the public interest
7.Criminal lawMedium

Duress as a defence is generally NOT available in English law to a charge of:

  1. ATheft
  2. BDrug possession
  3. CCriminal damage
  4. DMurder
8.Criminal lawHard

In Re A (Conjoined Twins) (2001), the Court of Appeal allowed surgery that would kill the weaker twin to save the stronger. This is often cited as authority that:

  1. ADoctors can never be liable for murder
  2. BNecessity is a general defence to murder whenever more lives would be saved than lost
  3. CParental consent is a defence to homicide
  4. DNecessity can, in very exceptional circumstances, justify an act that causes death
9.EU lawMedium

Article 34 TFEU prohibits:

  1. ACartels between undertakings
  2. BDiscrimination based on nationality in employment and the provision of services between member states
  3. CState aid to companies
  4. DQuantitative restrictions on imports and measures having equivalent effect between member states
10.EU lawHard

Altmark Trans (2003) set conditions under which compensation for public service obligations:

  1. AIs always prohibited state aid
  2. BIs not state aid because it confers no advantage
  3. CCan only be paid to state-owned companies
  4. DMust be approved by the European Parliament

2Solutions

1.Contract law

Answer: D · Put the innocent party in the position as if the contract had been performed

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: general principle, found in most legal systems. Contract damages usually protect the expectation interest. Punitive damages are generally not awarded for breach of contract.

Answer

D · Put the innocent party in the position as if the contract had been performed
2.Contract law

Answer: D · There was no contract, because the terms were too vague

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. An agreement is not a contract if its essential terms are too uncertain for the court to give them meaning. In Hillas v Arcos, a previous contract and trade practice allowed the court to fill the gap.

Answer

D · There was no contract, because the terms were too vague
3.Tort law

Answer: B · Article 6:162 BW

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: Dutch law. Article 6:162 BW requires an unlawful act attributable to the wrongdoer that causes damage. Book 3:40 concerns invalidity of juridical acts.

Answer

B · Article 6:162 BW
4.Tort law

Answer: B · Not vicariously liable, as the doctor was an independent contractor running his own business

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The court confirmed that vicarious liability does not extend to genuine independent contractors. The doctor had his own practice and other clients, and was not part of the bank's business.

Answer

B · Not vicariously liable, as the doctor was an independent contractor running his own business
5.Constitutional law

Answer: B · Pursues a legitimate aim, is suitable, necessary and balanced

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: general principle, found in most legal systems. A proportionate measure serves a legitimate aim, is suitable to achieve it, goes no further than necessary and strikes a fair balance between interests.

Answer

B · Pursues a legitimate aim, is suitable, necessary and balanced
6.Constitutional law

Answer: C · General words in a statute are presumed not to override fundamental rights

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Parliament can legislate contrary to fundamental rights, but must do so with express words or necessary implication, so the political cost is clear.

Answer

C · General words in a statute are presumed not to override fundamental rights
7.Criminal law

Answer: D · Murder

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Duress is not a defence to murder or attempted murder in English law, because the law will not excuse taking an innocent life to save one's own.

Answer

D · Murder
8.Criminal law

Answer: D · Necessity can, in very exceptional circumstances, justify an act that causes death

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Brooke LJ accepted necessity where the act was needed to avoid inevitable and irreparable evil, no more was done than necessary, and the evil inflicted was not disproportionate.

Answer

D · Necessity can, in very exceptional circumstances, justify an act that causes death
9.EU law

Answer: D · Quantitative restrictions on imports and measures having equivalent effect between member states

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: EU law. Article 34 bans quotas and measures having equivalent effect (MEQRs), as defined in Dassonville; Article 36 allows justifications.

Answer

D · Quantitative restrictions on imports and measures having equivalent effect between member states
10.EU law

Answer: B · Is not state aid because it confers no advantage

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: EU law. If the obligations are clearly defined, parameters are set in advance, compensation does not exceed costs plus reasonable profit, and costs reflect an efficient undertaking or tender, there is no advantage and no aid.

Answer

B · Is not state aid because it confers no advantage

ExamProblems · examproblems.com/courses/introduction-to-law