Introduction to Law: cram pack

Formula sheets, the key method steps for every topic and 10 practice problems, with full solutions at the back.

New problemsBack to the course

In the print window, choose “Save as PDF” to keep a copy on your device.

1Practice problems

1.Contract lawMedium

A seller says the farms are "fully let" but does not mention that the tenants have given notice to leave. This is:

  1. AMere silence, which is never actionable
  2. BA statement of opinion only
  3. CA mere puff with no legal effect
  4. DA misrepresentation by half-truth
2.Contract lawHard

A wife guarantees her husband's business debts to a bank. Under RBS v Etridge (No 2), the bank should normally:

  1. ASeek a court's approval of the guarantee
  2. BHave the husband explain the risks to her
  3. CRefuse the guarantee unless she has her own income
  4. DObtain confirmation that a solicitor has advised her
3.Tort lawMedium

Two chimney sweeps die from fumes while sealing a chimney, despite warnings about the danger. In Roles v Nathan, the occupier was:

  1. ANot liable, because specialists can be expected to guard against risks of their trade
  2. BLiable, because the warnings were given orally
  3. CNot liable, because the sweeps were trespassers
  4. DLiable, because occupiers must make premises completely safe for every visitor, including specialists
4.Tort lawHard

Members of a religious teaching order abused pupils at schools. The brothers were not employees of the order. In Various Claimants v Catholic Child Welfare Society, the Supreme Court held the order:

  1. AVicariously liable, as the relationship was akin to employment
  2. BNot liable, because the order did not own the schools
  3. CNot liable, because the brothers were not employees
  4. DLiable only in contract to the schools
5.Constitutional lawMedium

The Dutch Constitution (Article 120) forbids courts from:

  1. AApplying international treaties
  2. BHearing criminal cases
  3. CReviewing Acts of Parliament for compatibility with the Constitution
  4. DReviewing decisions of municipalities and provinces against national statutes
6.Constitutional lawHard

Article 79(3) of the German Basic Law (the "eternity clause") forbids amendments that affect:

  1. AOnly the articles on taxation
  2. BAny article of the Basic Law at all
  3. CThe federal structure, the Länder's participation in legislation, or the principles in Articles 1 and 20
  4. DThe electoral system, the number of seats in the Bundestag, or any of the rules in Articles 38 to 48 on elections
7.Criminal lawMedium

Joint enterprise (accessorial liability) after R v Jogee requires that the accessory:

  1. AWas present at the scene by chance
  2. BMerely foresaw as a real possibility that the principal might commit the crime
  3. CWas related to the principal
  4. DIntended to assist or encourage the principal to commit the crime
8.Criminal lawHard

Gross negligence manslaughter in English law (R v Adomako) requires:

  1. AA duty of care, breach causing death, and negligence so bad that it should be criminal
  2. BIntention to kill
  3. CAn unlawful and dangerous act causing death, judged objectively by sober and reasonable people
  4. DSubjective recklessness about death
9.EU lawMedium

In Lawrie-Blum (1986), the Court defined a "worker" under Article 45 TFEU as a person who:

  1. AIs registered with a national trade union
  2. BHolds a permanent full-time contract of employment registered with the authorities of the host member state
  3. CEarns at least the national minimum wage for a year
  4. DPerforms services for and under the direction of another in return for remuneration
10.EU lawHard

Under the indirect effect principle (Von Colson, Marleasing), national courts must:

  1. AIgnore national law that conflicts with any directive in private disputes
  2. BApply directives only after the Commission approves
  3. CRefer every case to the Court of Justice
  4. DInterpret national law as far as possible in conformity with directives

2Solutions

1.Contract law

Answer: D · A misrepresentation by half-truth

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. A statement that is literally true but misleading because of what it leaves out can be a misrepresentation.

Answer

D · A misrepresentation by half-truth
2.Contract law

Answer: D · Obtain confirmation that a solicitor has advised her

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Where a person stands surety for the debts of a partner in a non-commercial relationship, the bank is put on inquiry. It can protect itself by getting a solicitor's confirmation that the risks were explained.

Answer

D · Obtain confirmation that a solicitor has advised her
3.Tort law

Answer: A · Not liable, because specialists can be expected to guard against risks of their trade

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. An occupier may expect a person exercising their calling to appreciate and guard against special risks of it. The warnings also helped discharge the duty.

Answer

A · Not liable, because specialists can be expected to guard against risks of their trade
4.Tort law

Answer: A · Vicariously liable, as the relationship was akin to employment

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The brothers worked under the order's direction, as part of its mission and hierarchy, so the relationship was sufficiently akin to employment. The abuse was also closely connected to that relationship.

Answer

A · Vicariously liable, as the relationship was akin to employment
5.Constitutional law

Answer: C · Reviewing Acts of Parliament for compatibility with the Constitution

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: Dutch law. Article 120 prohibits constitutional review of Acts of Parliament, but Article 94 lets courts disapply statutes that conflict with self-executing treaty provisions such as the ECHR.

Answer

C · Reviewing Acts of Parliament for compatibility with the Constitution
6.Constitutional law

Answer: C · The federal structure, the Länder's participation in legislation, or the principles in Articles 1 and 20

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: German law. Some core principles, including human dignity, democracy, the rule of law and federalism, cannot be changed even by the normal two-thirds majorities.

Answer

C · The federal structure, the Länder's participation in legislation, or the principles in Articles 1 and 20
7.Criminal law

Answer: D · Intended to assist or encourage the principal to commit the crime

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Jogee held that foresight is only evidence of intent; the accessory must intend to assist or encourage the commission of the offence.

Answer

D · Intended to assist or encourage the principal to commit the crime
8.Criminal law

Answer: A · A duty of care, breach causing death, and negligence so bad that it should be criminal

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The jury must find a duty, a breach causing death and that the breach was so gross as to deserve criminal sanction; a serious and obvious risk of death must have been foreseeable.

Answer

A · A duty of care, breach causing death, and negligence so bad that it should be criminal
9.EU law

Answer: D · Performs services for and under the direction of another in return for remuneration

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: EU law. The essential feature of an employment relationship is that a person performs services for a period under the direction of another in return for remuneration; trainee teachers qualified.

Answer

D · Performs services for and under the direction of another in return for remuneration
10.EU law

Answer: D · Interpret national law as far as possible in conformity with directives

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: EU law. Courts must interpret national law, as far as possible, in light of the wording and purpose of a directive, but not contra legem.

Answer

D · Interpret national law as far as possible in conformity with directives

ExamProblems · examproblems.com/courses/introduction-to-law