Introduction to Law: cram pack

A court will imply a term in fact into a commercial contract only if:

1. AIt is necessary for business efficacy or so obvious it goes without saying
2. BIt is usual in contracts in other industries
3. CIt would be reasonable and fair to both parties, even if it is not necessary
4. DIt would benefit the weaker party

A client repudiates an advertising contract the same day it is made. The agency ignores this, displays the adverts for the full period and sues for the price. In White and Carter v McGregor:

1. AThe agency could recover the full price
2. BThe agency could only claim damages after mitigating
3. CThe agency could recover nothing
4. DThe agency had to obtain a court order first

An occupier hires a reputable lift company to maintain a lift. The company's negligence causes an accident. Under Haseldine v Daw, the occupier is:

1. ALiable, because maintenance is non-delegable
2. BLiable only if the lift is new
3. CNot liable, if it reasonably chose a competent contractor
4. DLiable for any defect on its premises

Residents complain of noise from a motor sports stadium that had been used for years and had planning permission. In Coventry v Lawrence, the Supreme Court held that:

1. ACourts must always grant an injunction where nuisance is proved
2. BComing to the nuisance was a complete defence
3. CPlanning permission was a complete defence to the nuisance claim
4. DPlanning permission was not in itself a defence, and damages instead of an injunction should be considered more flexibly

In the GCHQ case, the House of Lords held that the exercise of prerogative powers:

1. ACan be judicially reviewed, depending on its subject matter
2. BIs always fully reviewable, whatever subject matter it concerns
3. CCan never be reviewed by the courts
4. DCan be reviewed only if Parliament agrees

A woman with a terminal illness asks for a guarantee that her husband will not be prosecuted for helping her die. In Pretty v UK, the European Court of Human Rights held that Article 2:

1. ADoes not include a right to die
2. BRequires an immunity for her husband
3. CRequires states to allow assisted suicide
4. DWas not engaged by her case at all

The "thin skull" rule in criminal law means:

1. AA frail victim breaks the chain of causation
2. BOnly healthy victims are protected
3. CThe victim's injuries must be foreseeable in extent
4. DThe defendant must take the victim as they find them

Conspiracy in English law requires:

1. AA written plan
2. BAn agreement between two or more people to commit a crime, with intent that it be carried out
3. CAt least one of the conspirators to have carried out an overt act towards committing the agreed crime
4. DThe crime to be actually committed

Internationale Handelsgesellschaft (1970) held that the validity of a Community measure:

1. ARequires approval by a national referendum
2. BCannot be affected by claims that it breaches national constitutional rights
3. CDepends on its compatibility with the fundamental rights in each national constitution
4. DCan be reviewed by any national court that doubts it

In R v Bouchereau (1977), the Court held that a member state may expel an EU national on public policy grounds only if their conduct represents:

1. AAny criminal conviction in the host state
2. BA burden on the host state's social assistance system or a risk that the person will become unemployed in future
3. CA breach of the host state's immigration rules
4. DA genuine and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society