Introduction to Law: cram pack

A customer signs a contract containing an exclusion clause without reading it. Absent fraud or misrepresentation, the clause is generally:

1. AIncorporated only if it was explained orally
2. BNot incorporated, because it was not read
3. CIncorporated, because a signature binds the signer
4. DVoid for unilateral mistake

Under the EU Unfair Terms Directive, a non-negotiated consumer contract term is unfair if:

1. AIt benefits the trader in any way, even where the consumer's rights are not significantly affected
2. BThe consumer did not read it
3. CIt was written in small font
4. DContrary to good faith, it causes a significant imbalance to the consumer's detriment

A council leaves an abandoned boat on its land. Two boys jack it up to repair it, and it falls and injures one. In Jolley v Sutton LBC, the council was:

1. ALiable, because the broad type of accident was foreseeable
2. BLiable only to the boy who used the jack
3. CNot liable, because repairs are not play
4. DNot liable, because the boys' exact actions were unforeseeable

A tannery spills small amounts of solvent over many years. It seeps underground and contaminates a water company's borehole, which nobody could have foreseen. In Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather:

1. AThe tannery was not liable, because the type of damage was not foreseeable
2. BThe tannery was liable, because Rylands liability is strict and needs no foreseeability
3. CThe tannery was liable in negligence instead
4. DThe water company was barred by contributory negligence

In CCSU v Minister for the Civil Service (the GCHQ case), Lord Diplock classified the grounds of judicial review as:

1. AJurisdiction, motive and fairness
2. BLegality, legitimacy and proportionality
3. CIllegality, irrationality and procedural impropriety
4. DFraud, mistake and duress

In the Case of Proclamations (1610), the court held that the King:

1. ACould not create new offences by proclamation
2. BCould dismiss judges who disagreed
3. CCould suspend Acts of Parliament
4. DCould change any law by proclamation

D drives a car she believes is her own, but which is actually V's identical car. She is not guilty of theft because:

1. AThe car was insured by V
2. BShe is not dishonest and lacks intent to deprive another
3. CShe returned it the next morning
4. DCars cannot be stolen under the Theft Act

Which principle comes from DPP v Majewski (1977)?

1. ADrunkenness reduces murder to manslaughter in every case
2. BIntoxication can never be considered by a jury
3. CVoluntary intoxication is no defence to crimes of basic intent
4. DInvoluntary intoxication is always a complete defence

In Lawrie-Blum (1986), the Court defined a "worker" under Article 45 TFEU as a person who:

1. AIs registered with a national trade union
2. BEarns at least the national minimum wage for a year
3. CHolds a permanent full-time contract of employment registered with the authorities of the host member state
4. DPerforms services for and under the direction of another in return for remuneration

Keck and Mithouard (1993) held that national rules on "selling arrangements" fall outside Article 34 TFEU if they:

1. AApply to all traders in the national territory and affect domestic and imported products equally in law and fact
2. BAre adopted by local authorities
3. CConcern the composition, labelling or packaging of products, even if they apply equally to all traders in the national territory
4. DDiscriminate against imported products