1Practice problems
1.Contract lawMedium
Under the Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943, money paid before a frustrating event is generally:
- ARecoverable, though the court may let the payee keep some for expenses
- BPayable twice, as a penalty
- CLost, because the loss must lie where it falls once the contract is frustrated
- DPaid into court for distribution
2.Contract lawHard
A chartered ship is returned late, and the owner loses a very profitable follow-on charter. In The Achilleas, the House of Lords held the charterer was liable:
- AFor punitive damages, because the delay was deliberate
- BOnly for the market rate difference during the overrun period
- CFor no loss, because late return is not a breach
- DFor the whole profit lost on the follow-on charter, as it was foreseeable
3.Tort lawMedium
A premature baby goes blind. Excess oxygen negligently given was only one of five possible causes. In Wilsher v Essex AHA, the claim:
- AFailed, because no duty was owed to a baby
- BFailed, because the claimant could not prove the negligence caused the blindness
- CSucceeded, with damages reduced by four fifths
- DSucceeded, because the negligence materially increased the risk of the blindness
4.Tort lawHard
Under the EU Product Liability Directive, the "development risks" defence allows a producer to escape liability if:
- AThe state of scientific and technical knowledge when the product was circulated did not allow the defect to be discovered
- BThe consumer did not read the instructions
- CThe producer was not negligent in manufacturing
- DThe product was sold at a low price
5.Constitutional lawMedium
In Hirst v UK (No 2), the European Court of Human Rights held that the UK's blanket ban on voting by convicted prisoners:
- AWas within the UK's margin of appreciation
- BViolated the right to free elections in Protocol 1, Article 3
- CViolated the right to freedom of expression in Article 10 of the Convention
- DWas justified because prisoners have no rights
6.Constitutional lawHard
The "dualist" approach to international law means that:
- ATreaties cannot be signed without a referendum
- BInternational law applies automatically in national courts as soon as a treaty is ratified
- CCourts must apply only international law
- DTreaties must be incorporated into national law before courts apply them domestically
7.Criminal lawMedium
D, carrying an imitation gun and a threatening note, walks towards a post office to rob it but is arrested outside before entering. Under the Criminal Attempts Act 1981, D is most likely guilty of:
- ARobbery, because the intention was proved
- BNothing as attempted robbery yet, because D has not gone beyond preparation
- CAttempted robbery, because D was carrying an imitation gun and a threatening note
- DBurglary, because D intended to enter the building
8.Criminal lawHard
In R v Windle (1952), the court interpreted "wrong" in the M'Naghten Rules to mean:
- ALegally wrong
- BWrong according to the defendant's own beliefs
- CMorally wrong by society's standards
- DWrong in the eyes of a doctor
9.EU lawMedium
Article 352 TFEU (the flexibility clause) allows the EU to act where the Treaties have not provided the necessary powers, but requires:
- AA referendum in every member state
- BA simple majority in the Parliament only
- CUnanimity in the Council and the consent of the European Parliament
- DQualified majority in the Council and the consent of the European Parliament
10.EU lawHard
In Höfner and Elser (1991), a German public employment agency was held to be an "undertaking" for competition law because:
- AIt was owned by foreign investors
- BIt was registered as a private company and financed by the fees it charged employers
- CIt was engaged in an economic activity, regardless of its legal status and financing
- DIt made a large profit every year
2Solutions
1.Contract law
Answer: A · Recoverable, though the court may let the payee keep some for expenses
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Sums paid are recoverable and sums payable cease to be payable. The court may allow the payee to keep or recover an amount for expenses incurred, up to the sums paid or payable.
A · Recoverable, though the court may let the payee keep some for expenses
2.Contract law
Answer: B · Only for the market rate difference during the overrun period
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The majority held that the charterer had not assumed responsibility for the loss of an unusually profitable follow-on charter, given the general understanding in the shipping market.
B · Only for the market rate difference during the overrun period
3.Tort law
Answer: B · Failed, because the claimant could not prove the negligence caused the blindness
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The claimant must prove causation on the balance of probabilities. With several distinct possible causes, showing a material increase in risk from one of them was not enough.
B · Failed, because the claimant could not prove the negligence caused the blindness
4.Tort law
Answer: A · The state of scientific and technical knowledge when the product was circulated did not allow the defect to be discovered
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: EU law. The defence covers defects that could not be discovered given the state of scientific and technical knowledge at the time; mere absence of negligence is not enough.
A · The state of scientific and technical knowledge when the product was circulated did not allow the defect to be discovered
5.Constitutional law
Answer: B · Violated the right to free elections in Protocol 1, Article 3
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: European Convention on Human Rights. The Court accepted some restrictions on prisoner voting could be legitimate, but an automatic ban for all convicted prisoners was disproportionate.
B · Violated the right to free elections in Protocol 1, Article 3
6.Constitutional law
Answer: D · Treaties must be incorporated into national law before courts apply them domestically
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: general principle, found in most legal systems. In dualist systems international and national law are separate; treaties need implementing legislation. The Netherlands is more monist: binding treaty provisions can have direct effect.
D · Treaties must be incorporated into national law before courts apply them domestically
7.Criminal law
Answer: B · Nothing as attempted robbery yet, because D has not gone beyond preparation
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. In Campbell the defendant was arrested near the post office without entering it, and the court held his acts were merely preparatory, though other offences (such as possession of a weapon) may apply.
B · Nothing as attempted robbery yet, because D has not gone beyond preparation
8.Criminal law
Answer: A · Legally wrong
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. A defendant who knows the act is against the law cannot rely on insanity, even if they believe it to be morally right; R v Johnson (2007) confirmed this.
9.EU law
Answer: C · Unanimity in the Council and the consent of the European Parliament
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: EU law. The flexibility clause needs a unanimous Council decision on a Commission proposal with Parliament's consent, and it cannot be used to harmonise where the Treaties exclude it.
C · Unanimity in the Council and the consent of the European Parliament
10.EU law
Answer: C · It was engaged in an economic activity, regardless of its legal status and financing
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: EU law. An undertaking is any entity engaged in an economic activity; the fact that it is public or not for profit does not matter.
C · It was engaged in an economic activity, regardless of its legal status and financing