Introduction to Law: cram pack

Formula sheets, the key method steps for every topic and 10 practice problems, with full solutions at the back.

New problemsBack to the course

In the print window, choose “Save as PDF” to keep a copy on your device.

1Practice problems

1.Contract lawMedium

An acceptance is sent by telex and arrives in the offeror's office during working hours. Under Entores v Miles Far East, acceptance takes effect:

  1. AWhen it is confirmed by post
  2. BWhen it is sent by the offeree
  3. CWhen the offeror reads it a week later
  4. DWhen it is received by the offeror
2.Contract lawHard

Two parties agree to continue negotiating for the sale of a business, with no fixed period. In Walford v Miles, the House of Lords held that a bare agreement to negotiate in good faith is:

  1. AUnenforceable, because it lacks certainty
  2. BEnforceable only if made in writing
  3. CEnforceable as a lock-out agreement
  4. DEnforceable, as an implied duty of good faith
3.Tort lawMedium

A house is built on defective foundations, approved by the local authority. Cracks appear and the owner sells at a loss. In Murphy v Brentwood DC, the loss was:

  1. APure economic loss, not recoverable in negligence
  2. BRecoverable only against the buyer
  3. CRecoverable because the council approved the plans
  4. DPhysical damage, fully recoverable
4.Tort lawHard

A council's water pipe to a block of flats leaks and causes an embankment to collapse, exposing a gas main. In Transco v Stockport MBC, the House of Lords held:

  1. AThe council was liable in negligence for the leak
  2. BThere was no Rylands liability, because supplying water by pipe was not a non-natural use
  3. CRylands v Fletcher was abolished in English law
  4. DThe council was strictly liable for all escaping water
5.Constitutional lawMedium

In Dudgeon v UK, the European Court of Human Rights held that criminalising consensual homosexual acts between adult men in Northern Ireland:

  1. AWas justified under Article 8(2) as necessary to protect public morals
  2. BViolated the right to respect for private life under Article 8
  3. CWas outside the scope of the Convention
  4. DViolated only the right to marry
6.Constitutional lawHard

In YL v Birmingham City Council (2007), the House of Lords held that a private care home housing residents funded by a council:

  1. ACould not house publicly funded residents
  2. BWas a hybrid public authority bound by the Act for all the care it provided
  3. CWas not exercising a function of a public nature under the Human Rights Act
  4. DWas a core public authority
7.Criminal lawMedium

D is present when a crime is committed but does nothing to help or encourage it. Following R v Clarkson, D is:

  1. AThe principal, because D witnessed the whole crime
  2. BAn accessory, because D could have called the police
  3. CAn accessory, because voluntary presence at the scene always amounts to encouragement
  4. DNot an accessory, because mere presence without intent to encourage is not enough
8.Criminal lawHard

In R v Cheshire, the court held that negligent medical treatment of a gunshot victim:

  1. AMakes the doctors liable for murder
  2. BAlways breaks the chain of causation
  3. CDid not break the chain of causation unless it was so independent and potent that the original wound became insignificant
  4. DBroke the chain of causation whenever it was negligent enough to be the immediate medical cause of death, even if the wound still operated
9.EU lawMedium

Under Directive 2004/38, an EU citizen may reside in another member state for up to three months:

  1. AWith only a valid identity card or passport and no other conditions
  2. BOnly if they prove sufficient resources and comprehensive sickness insurance
  3. COnly if they register with the police on arrival
  4. DOnly if they have a job offer in that state
10.EU lawHard

In Höfner and Elser (1991), a German public employment agency was held to be an "undertaking" for competition law because:

  1. AIt was engaged in an economic activity, regardless of its legal status and financing
  2. BIt was owned by foreign investors
  3. CIt made a large profit every year
  4. DIt was registered as a private company and financed by the fees it charged employers

2Solutions

1.Contract law

Answer: D · When it is received by the offeror

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. For instantaneous communications, acceptance is effective when received by the offeror. The Brimnes added that a message received in office hours is effective then, even if not read.

Answer

D · When it is received by the offeror
2.Contract law

Answer: A · Unenforceable, because it lacks certainty

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. An agreement to negotiate is too uncertain to be enforced, since a party can withdraw from negotiations for any reason. A lock-out agreement for a fixed period, supported by consideration, can be enforceable.

Answer

A · Unenforceable, because it lacks certainty
3.Tort law

Answer: A · Pure economic loss, not recoverable in negligence

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The cost of repairing a defect in a building, or its reduced value, is pure economic loss. The House of Lords overruled Anns v Merton on this point.

Answer

A · Pure economic loss, not recoverable in negligence
4.Tort law

Answer: B · There was no Rylands liability, because supplying water by pipe was not a non-natural use

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The Lords kept the rule but confined it. A water supply pipe was an ordinary use, not one creating an exceptionally high risk, so there was no strict liability.

Answer

B · There was no Rylands liability, because supplying water by pipe was not a non-natural use
5.Constitutional law

Answer: B · Violated the right to respect for private life under Article 8

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: European Convention on Human Rights. The Court held that criminalising private consensual sexual acts was not necessary in a democratic society and breached Article 8.

Answer

B · Violated the right to respect for private life under Article 8
6.Constitutional law

Answer: C · Was not exercising a function of a public nature under the Human Rights Act

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The majority held that providing care under a commercial contract was not a public function. Parliament later provided that such providers act as public authorities in this context.

Answer

C · Was not exercising a function of a public nature under the Human Rights Act
7.Criminal law

Answer: D · Not an accessory, because mere presence without intent to encourage is not enough

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Presence at a crime can be evidence of encouragement, but liability requires actual encouragement and an intention to encourage.

Answer

D · Not an accessory, because mere presence without intent to encourage is not enough
8.Criminal law

Answer: C · Did not break the chain of causation unless it was so independent and potent that the original wound became insignificant

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Medical negligence rarely breaks the chain; the defendant remains liable if their act still contributed significantly to the death.

Answer

C · Did not break the chain of causation unless it was so independent and potent that the original wound became insignificant
9.EU law

Answer: A · With only a valid identity card or passport and no other conditions

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: EU law. For the first three months the only requirement is a valid identity document; longer residence requires being a worker, self-employed, self-sufficient or a student (Article 7).

Answer

A · With only a valid identity card or passport and no other conditions
10.EU law

Answer: A · It was engaged in an economic activity, regardless of its legal status and financing

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: EU law. An undertaking is any entity engaged in an economic activity; the fact that it is public or not for profit does not matter.

Answer

A · It was engaged in an economic activity, regardless of its legal status and financing

ExamProblems · examproblems.com/courses/introduction-to-law