1Practice problems
1.Contract lawMedium
An acceptance is sent by telex and arrives in the offeror's office during working hours. Under Entores v Miles Far East, acceptance takes effect:
- AWhen it is confirmed by post
- BWhen it is sent by the offeree
- CWhen the offeror reads it a week later
- DWhen it is received by the offeror
2.Contract lawHard
Two parties agree to continue negotiating for the sale of a business, with no fixed period. In Walford v Miles, the House of Lords held that a bare agreement to negotiate in good faith is:
- AUnenforceable, because it lacks certainty
- BEnforceable only if made in writing
- CEnforceable as a lock-out agreement
- DEnforceable, as an implied duty of good faith
3.Tort lawMedium
A house is built on defective foundations, approved by the local authority. Cracks appear and the owner sells at a loss. In Murphy v Brentwood DC, the loss was:
- APure economic loss, not recoverable in negligence
- BRecoverable only against the buyer
- CRecoverable because the council approved the plans
- DPhysical damage, fully recoverable
4.Tort lawHard
A council's water pipe to a block of flats leaks and causes an embankment to collapse, exposing a gas main. In Transco v Stockport MBC, the House of Lords held:
- AThe council was liable in negligence for the leak
- BThere was no Rylands liability, because supplying water by pipe was not a non-natural use
- CRylands v Fletcher was abolished in English law
- DThe council was strictly liable for all escaping water
5.Constitutional lawMedium
In Dudgeon v UK, the European Court of Human Rights held that criminalising consensual homosexual acts between adult men in Northern Ireland:
- AWas justified under Article 8(2) as necessary to protect public morals
- BViolated the right to respect for private life under Article 8
- CWas outside the scope of the Convention
- DViolated only the right to marry
6.Constitutional lawHard
In YL v Birmingham City Council (2007), the House of Lords held that a private care home housing residents funded by a council:
- ACould not house publicly funded residents
- BWas a hybrid public authority bound by the Act for all the care it provided
- CWas not exercising a function of a public nature under the Human Rights Act
- DWas a core public authority
7.Criminal lawMedium
D is present when a crime is committed but does nothing to help or encourage it. Following R v Clarkson, D is:
- AThe principal, because D witnessed the whole crime
- BAn accessory, because D could have called the police
- CAn accessory, because voluntary presence at the scene always amounts to encouragement
- DNot an accessory, because mere presence without intent to encourage is not enough
8.Criminal lawHard
In R v Cheshire, the court held that negligent medical treatment of a gunshot victim:
- AMakes the doctors liable for murder
- BAlways breaks the chain of causation
- CDid not break the chain of causation unless it was so independent and potent that the original wound became insignificant
- DBroke the chain of causation whenever it was negligent enough to be the immediate medical cause of death, even if the wound still operated
9.EU lawMedium
Under Directive 2004/38, an EU citizen may reside in another member state for up to three months:
- AWith only a valid identity card or passport and no other conditions
- BOnly if they prove sufficient resources and comprehensive sickness insurance
- COnly if they register with the police on arrival
- DOnly if they have a job offer in that state
10.EU lawHard
In Höfner and Elser (1991), a German public employment agency was held to be an "undertaking" for competition law because:
- AIt was engaged in an economic activity, regardless of its legal status and financing
- BIt was owned by foreign investors
- CIt made a large profit every year
- DIt was registered as a private company and financed by the fees it charged employers
2Solutions
1.Contract law
Answer: D · When it is received by the offeror
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. For instantaneous communications, acceptance is effective when received by the offeror. The Brimnes added that a message received in office hours is effective then, even if not read.
D · When it is received by the offeror
2.Contract law
Answer: A · Unenforceable, because it lacks certainty
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. An agreement to negotiate is too uncertain to be enforced, since a party can withdraw from negotiations for any reason. A lock-out agreement for a fixed period, supported by consideration, can be enforceable.
A · Unenforceable, because it lacks certainty
3.Tort law
Answer: A · Pure economic loss, not recoverable in negligence
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The cost of repairing a defect in a building, or its reduced value, is pure economic loss. The House of Lords overruled Anns v Merton on this point.
A · Pure economic loss, not recoverable in negligence
4.Tort law
Answer: B · There was no Rylands liability, because supplying water by pipe was not a non-natural use
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The Lords kept the rule but confined it. A water supply pipe was an ordinary use, not one creating an exceptionally high risk, so there was no strict liability.
B · There was no Rylands liability, because supplying water by pipe was not a non-natural use
5.Constitutional law
Answer: B · Violated the right to respect for private life under Article 8
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: European Convention on Human Rights. The Court held that criminalising private consensual sexual acts was not necessary in a democratic society and breached Article 8.
B · Violated the right to respect for private life under Article 8
6.Constitutional law
Answer: C · Was not exercising a function of a public nature under the Human Rights Act
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The majority held that providing care under a commercial contract was not a public function. Parliament later provided that such providers act as public authorities in this context.
C · Was not exercising a function of a public nature under the Human Rights Act
7.Criminal law
Answer: D · Not an accessory, because mere presence without intent to encourage is not enough
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Presence at a crime can be evidence of encouragement, but liability requires actual encouragement and an intention to encourage.
D · Not an accessory, because mere presence without intent to encourage is not enough
8.Criminal law
Answer: C · Did not break the chain of causation unless it was so independent and potent that the original wound became insignificant
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Medical negligence rarely breaks the chain; the defendant remains liable if their act still contributed significantly to the death.
C · Did not break the chain of causation unless it was so independent and potent that the original wound became insignificant
9.EU law
Answer: A · With only a valid identity card or passport and no other conditions
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: EU law. For the first three months the only requirement is a valid identity document; longer residence requires being a worker, self-employed, self-sufficient or a student (Article 7).
A · With only a valid identity card or passport and no other conditions
10.EU law
Answer: A · It was engaged in an economic activity, regardless of its legal status and financing
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: EU law. An undertaking is any entity engaged in an economic activity; the fact that it is public or not for profit does not matter.
A · It was engaged in an economic activity, regardless of its legal status and financing