Introduction to Law: cram pack

Formula sheets, the key method steps for every topic and 10 practice problems, with full solutions at the back.

New problemsBack to the course

In the print window, choose “Save as PDF” to keep a copy on your device.

1Practice problems

1.Contract lawMedium

What is an exclusion clause?

  1. AA term that limits or excludes one party's liability
  2. BA term that excludes a party from paying VAT
  3. CA clause allowing termination at any time
  4. DA term that excludes third parties from the contract
2.Contract lawHard

A pays B money to bet on shares using insider information, which is illegal. The bet never happens and A wants the money back. In Patel v Mirza, the Supreme Court held:

  1. AA could not recover, because no claim can be founded on an illegal agreement
  2. BA could recover only half the money
  3. CThe money passed to the state as illegal proceeds
  4. DA could recover the money, applying a policy-based approach to illegality
3.Tort lawMedium

Pure economic loss caused by negligent acts is:

  1. AGenerally not recoverable, with exceptions such as negligent misstatement
  2. BRecoverable only where the defendant's conduct was also a criminal offence of some kind
  3. CRecoverable only for companies
  4. DAlways recoverable
4.Tort lawHard

A surveyor values a modest house for a mortgage lender, knowing the buyer will rely on it. The report is negligent and contains a disclaimer. In Smith v Eric S Bush, the House of Lords held:

  1. AThe lender alone could sue the surveyor
  2. BThe disclaimer excluded all liability to the buyer
  3. CThe surveyor owed a duty to the buyer, and the disclaimer failed the reasonableness test
  4. DThe surveyor owed no duty, because the buyer was not the client who commissioned the report
5.Constitutional lawMedium

In R v Bow Street Magistrate, ex p Pinochet (No 2), the House of Lords set aside its own earlier decision because:

  1. AThe case had been heard in private
  2. BPinochet had not been given a lawyer of his own choice at the hearing
  3. COne judge had links to a charity that was a party to the case
  4. DThe judges had made a legal mistake
6.Constitutional lawHard

In the Harmonisatiewet judgment (1989), the Dutch Supreme Court held that Article 120 of the Constitution:

  1. AApplies only to delegated legislation
  2. BWas overridden by the principle of legal certainty
  3. CPrevents courts from reviewing Acts of Parliament against fundamental principles of law
  4. DAllows courts to strike down Acts that breach fundamental principles such as legal certainty
7.Criminal lawMedium

D grabs V's handbag so forcefully that V's hand is pulled down. Following R v Clouden, this can be:

  1. AOnly theft, because there was no direct contact with V's body
  2. BRobbery, because force was used on the person to steal
  3. COnly battery, because the bag was not taken
  4. DBurglary, because the bag was V's property
8.Criminal lawHard

Under the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007, an organisation is guilty if the way its activities are managed causes death and amounts to a gross breach of a duty of care, and:

  1. AA single identified director is first personally convicted of gross negligence manslaughter
  2. BThe victim was an employee of the organisation
  3. CThe organisation intended to cause death
  4. DThe way senior management organised the activities was a substantial element of the breach
9.EU lawMedium

Under Article 51 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, the Charter binds member states:

  1. ANever, as it binds only the EU institutions
  2. BOnly when their constitution allows it
  3. COnly when they are implementing EU law
  4. DIn all their activities, including purely national matters
10.EU lawHard

Under Article 263 TFEU, a private applicant may challenge a regulatory act that does not need implementing measures if it is:

  1. AOf direct concern to them
  2. BAdopted unanimously
  3. CPublished in a national newspaper
  4. DOf interest to them in any way

2Solutions

1.Contract law

Answer: A · A term that limits or excludes one party's liability

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: general principle, found in most legal systems. Exclusion and limitation clauses restrict liability. They must be incorporated and are controlled by legislation, especially in consumer contracts.

Answer

A · A term that limits or excludes one party's liability
2.Contract law

Answer: D · A could recover the money, applying a policy-based approach to illegality

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The court asks whether enforcing the claim would harm the integrity of the legal system, considering the purpose of the prohibition, other public policies and proportionality. Restitution here did not.

Answer

D · A could recover the money, applying a policy-based approach to illegality
3.Tort law

Answer: A · Generally not recoverable, with exceptions such as negligent misstatement

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Courts generally refuse claims for pure economic loss from negligent acts, but allow them in special relationships, such as reliance on negligent advice (Hedley Byrne).

Answer

A · Generally not recoverable, with exceptions such as negligent misstatement
4.Tort law

Answer: C · The surveyor owed a duty to the buyer, and the disclaimer failed the reasonableness test

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The surveyor knew the buyer would rely on the valuation, which created a duty. Under UCTA, the disclaimer was not fair and reasonable for an ordinary house purchase.

Answer

C · The surveyor owed a duty to the buyer, and the disclaimer failed the reasonableness test
5.Constitutional law

Answer: C · One judge had links to a charity that was a party to the case

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Lord Hoffmann was a director of a charity connected with Amnesty International, which had intervened. A judge with such an interest in a party's cause is automatically disqualified.

Answer

C · One judge had links to a charity that was a party to the case
6.Constitutional law

Answer: C · Prevents courts from reviewing Acts of Parliament against fundamental principles of law

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: Dutch law. The court found the Act conflicted with legal certainty but held that Article 120 barred it from testing statutes against unwritten principles as well as against the Constitution.

Answer

C · Prevents courts from reviewing Acts of Parliament against fundamental principles of law
7.Criminal law

Answer: B · Robbery, because force was used on the person to steal

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Clouden held that wrenching a bag from someone's grasp can be force on the person; whether the force is enough is a question for the jury.

Answer

B · Robbery, because force was used on the person to steal
8.Criminal law

Answer: D · The way senior management organised the activities was a substantial element of the breach

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Section 1 focuses on management failures at senior level rather than one directing mind; the penalty is an unlimited fine, and individuals are not liable under the Act.

Answer

D · The way senior management organised the activities was a substantial element of the breach
9.EU law

Answer: C · Only when they are implementing EU law

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: EU law. The Charter applies to member states only when they act within the scope of EU law, as interpreted broadly in Åkerberg Fransson.

Answer

C · Only when they are implementing EU law
10.EU law

Answer: A · Of direct concern to them

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: EU law. For regulatory acts not entailing implementing measures, direct concern suffices; for other acts addressed to others, the applicant also needs individual concern (Plaumann).

Answer

A · Of direct concern to them

ExamProblems · examproblems.com/courses/introduction-to-law