Introduction to Law: cram pack

Formula sheets, the key method steps for every topic and 10 practice problems, with full solutions at the back.

New problemsBack to the course

In the print window, choose “Save as PDF” to keep a copy on your device.

1Practice problems

1.Contract lawMedium

A doctor selling his practice truthfully states its income, but the income falls sharply before the contract is signed and he says nothing. This is:

  1. AA misrepresentation, because he should have corrected the statement
  2. BA breach of an implied condition of quality
  3. CA mere opinion about future income
  4. DNot a misrepresentation, because the statement was true when it was made
2.Contract lawHard

A buyer specifically asks a surveyor to check aircraft noise at a property. The surveyor negligently reports no problem. In Farley v Skinner:

  1. ANo damages were recoverable, because damages for distress or discomfort are always excluded in contract
  2. BDamages for discomfort were recoverable, as peace of mind was an important object of the obligation
  3. CThe buyer had to sell the house before claiming
  4. DOnly the difference in market value was recoverable
3.Tort lawMedium

Strict liability means a defendant can be liable:

  1. AOnly if they acted intentionally
  2. BWithout proof of fault
  3. COnly if they broke a contract
  4. DOnly for criminal acts
4.Tort lawHard

Young offenders escape while their officers sleep, and damage a yacht nearby. In Home Office v Dorset Yacht Co, the House of Lords held:

  1. AA duty could be owed, because the officers had control over the offenders
  2. BNo duty, because the damage was done by third parties acting of their own free will
  3. CThe yacht owner was contributorily negligent
  4. DNo duty, because the Home Office is part of the Crown
5.Constitutional lawMedium

Constitutional conventions are:

  1. ANon-legal rules of political practice that are regarded as binding
  2. BInternational treaties about the constitution
  3. CWritten rules found in statutes that courts enforce like any other law
  4. DMeetings held to write a new constitution
6.Constitutional lawHard

In Madzimbamuto v Lardner-Burke, the Privy Council held that the UK Parliament could still legislate for Southern Rhodesia because:

  1. ARhodesia had consented to the legislation
  2. BRhodesia had become fully independent
  3. CThe convention was legally binding but had been waived by Rhodesia
  4. DA convention that it would not do so did not limit its legal power
7.Criminal lawMedium

D grabs V's handbag so forcefully that V's hand is pulled down. Following R v Clouden, this can be:

  1. ARobbery, because force was used on the person to steal
  2. BBurglary, because the bag was V's property
  3. COnly theft, because there was no direct contact with V's body
  4. DOnly battery, because the bag was not taken
8.Criminal lawHard

In R v G (2003), the House of Lords defined recklessness as:

  1. AFailure to notice an obvious risk that a reasonable person would have seen
  2. BAwareness of a risk that it was unreasonable to take in the circumstances
  3. CAny careless behaviour
  4. DIntention to cause harm
9.EU lawMedium

Directives generally do NOT have:

  1. ABinding force after the transposition deadline
  2. BHorizontal direct effect between private parties
  3. CAny legal effect at all
  4. DVertical direct effect against the state
10.EU lawHard

In Höfner and Elser (1991), a German public employment agency was held to be an "undertaking" for competition law because:

  1. AIt was owned by foreign investors
  2. BIt was engaged in an economic activity, regardless of its legal status and financing
  3. CIt made a large profit every year
  4. DIt was registered as a private company and financed by the fees it charged employers

2Solutions

1.Contract law

Answer: A · A misrepresentation, because he should have corrected the statement

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. A statement that becomes false before the contract is made must be corrected. Failing to do so is treated as a continuing misrepresentation.

Answer

A · A misrepresentation, because he should have corrected the statement
2.Contract law

Answer: B · Damages for discomfort were recoverable, as peace of mind was an important object of the obligation

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The House of Lords held that non-pecuniary damages are recoverable where a major or important object of the contract, not necessarily the only one, was to provide pleasure or peace of mind.

Answer

B · Damages for discomfort were recoverable, as peace of mind was an important object of the obligation
3.Tort law

Answer: B · Without proof of fault

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: general principle, found in most legal systems. In strict liability (for example under the EU Product Liability Directive) the claimant need not prove negligence, only the defect, damage and causation.

Answer

B · Without proof of fault
4.Tort law

Answer: A · A duty could be owed, because the officers had control over the offenders

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Liability for harm caused by third parties may arise where the defendant had control over them and the damage was a foreseeable result of the failure to supervise.

Answer

A · A duty could be owed, because the officers had control over the offenders
5.Constitutional law

Answer: A · Non-legal rules of political practice that are regarded as binding

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Conventions, such as the monarch granting royal assent, guide behaviour but are not enforced by courts (as confirmed in the Miller case).

Answer

A · Non-legal rules of political practice that are regarded as binding
6.Constitutional law

Answer: D · A convention that it would not do so did not limit its legal power

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Conventions may make it politically unthinkable for Parliament to act, but they do not limit its legal competence. Courts will apply an Act passed in breach of a convention.

Answer

D · A convention that it would not do so did not limit its legal power
7.Criminal law

Answer: A · Robbery, because force was used on the person to steal

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Clouden held that wrenching a bag from someone's grasp can be force on the person; whether the force is enough is a question for the jury.

Answer

A · Robbery, because force was used on the person to steal
8.Criminal law

Answer: B · Awareness of a risk that it was unreasonable to take in the circumstances

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. R v G restored a subjective test: the defendant must be aware of the risk and it must be unreasonable to take it, given the circumstances known to them.

Answer

B · Awareness of a risk that it was unreasonable to take in the circumstances
9.EU law

Answer: B · Horizontal direct effect between private parties

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: EU law. Unimplemented directives can be relied on against the state (vertical) but not against private individuals (horizontal), though indirect effect and state liability can help.

Answer

B · Horizontal direct effect between private parties
10.EU law

Answer: B · It was engaged in an economic activity, regardless of its legal status and financing

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: EU law. An undertaking is any entity engaged in an economic activity; the fact that it is public or not for profit does not matter.

Answer

B · It was engaged in an economic activity, regardless of its legal status and financing

ExamProblems · examproblems.com/courses/introduction-to-law