1Practice problems
1.Contract lawMedium
An unusual and onerous term in standard conditions will only be incorporated if:
- AIt is printed anywhere in the contract documents, however small the type
- BIt appears on the back of a receipt
- CIt was fairly and reasonably brought to the other party's attention
- DThe other party could have found it online
2.Contract lawHard
A husband who has left his wife signs a note promising to transfer the house to her if she pays off the mortgage. She does. In Merritt v Merritt, the promise was:
- AEnforceable only because it was made by deed
- BEnforceable, because separated spouses are presumed to intend legal relations
- CUnenforceable, because it was a domestic arrangement between husband and wife
- DUnenforceable, because she gave no consideration
3.Tort lawMedium
Two chimney sweeps die from fumes while sealing a chimney, despite warnings about the danger. In Roles v Nathan, the occupier was:
- ALiable, because the warnings were given orally
- BLiable, because occupiers must make premises completely safe for every visitor, including specialists
- CNot liable, because specialists can be expected to guard against risks of their trade
- DNot liable, because the sweeps were trespassers
4.Tort lawHard
Which statement about the "loss of a chance" doctrine in English medical negligence is correct?
- AThe doctrine applies only to economic loss in all cases
- BA lost chance of recovery below 50% is generally not compensated (Gregg v Scott)
- CAny lost chance is fully compensated
- DLost chances are compensated proportionately, as in claims for lost commercial chances
5.Constitutional lawMedium
In Thoburn v Sunderland City Council (the "metric martyrs" case), Laws LJ said that "constitutional statutes":
- AMust be approved by referendum
- BCannot be repealed at all
- CCannot be impliedly repealed, only expressly
- DPrevail automatically over all later Acts of Parliament
6.Constitutional lawHard
A woman with a terminal illness asks for a guarantee that her husband will not be prosecuted for helping her die. In Pretty v UK, the European Court of Human Rights held that Article 2:
- ADoes not include a right to die
- BRequires states to allow assisted suicide
- CRequires an immunity for her husband
- DWas not engaged by her case at all
7.Criminal lawMedium
A, a lifeguard paid to watch a pool, reads a magazine while a child drowns. A could be liable for an omission because of:
- AA contractual duty to act
- BHaving created the dangerous situation
- CBeing the only person who saw the child
- DA special relationship with the child's parents
8.Criminal lawHard
In R v Malcherek and Steel (1981), doctors switched off life-support machines after diagnosing brain death. The court held:
- ASwitching off did not break the chain; the original assailants caused the deaths
- BThe victims died of natural causes in law
- CThe doctors became the legal cause of death by deliberately switching off the machines
- DThe defendants were guilty only of attempted murder
9.EU lawMedium
If a member state does not comply with a Court judgment finding an infringement, under Article 260(2) TFEU the Court can:
- AExpel the state from the EU
- BImpose a lump sum or penalty payment on the state
- CSuspend the state's voting rights in the Council
- DAnnul the conflicting national law itself
10.EU lawHard
In Åkerberg Fransson (2013), a Swedish fisherman faced tax penalties and criminal proceedings for VAT fraud. The Court held that the Charter applied because:
- AThe fisherman was an EU institution employee
- BThe national measures fell within the scope of EU law on VAT and the EU's financial interests
- CSweden had incorporated the Charter into its constitution
- DThe Charter applies to every action of a member state, whether or not it involves EU law in any way
2Solutions
1.Contract law
Answer: C · It was fairly and reasonably brought to the other party's attention
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The more unusual or onerous a term, the more must be done to draw attention to it. Lord Denning said some clauses would need a red hand pointing to them.
C · It was fairly and reasonably brought to the other party's attention
2.Contract law
Answer: B · Enforceable, because separated spouses are presumed to intend legal relations
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. When spouses have separated, or are about to, the presumption against legal intention does not apply. Paying off the mortgage was also good consideration.
B · Enforceable, because separated spouses are presumed to intend legal relations
3.Tort law
Answer: C · Not liable, because specialists can be expected to guard against risks of their trade
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. An occupier may expect a person exercising their calling to appreciate and guard against special risks of it. The warnings also helped discharge the duty.
C · Not liable, because specialists can be expected to guard against risks of their trade
4.Tort law
Answer: B · A lost chance of recovery below 50% is generally not compensated (Gregg v Scott)
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. In Gregg v Scott the House of Lords refused to award damages for a reduced chance of survival that was already below 50%, keeping the balance of probabilities test.
B · A lost chance of recovery below 50% is generally not compensated (Gregg v Scott)
5.Constitutional law
Answer: C · Cannot be impliedly repealed, only expressly
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Laws LJ suggested a hierarchy between ordinary and constitutional statutes. A constitutional statute can be repealed only by clear express words, not by implication.
C · Cannot be impliedly repealed, only expressly
6.Constitutional law
Answer: A · Does not include a right to die
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: European Convention on Human Rights. Article 2 cannot be interpreted as giving the opposite right to choose death. The Court also accepted that Article 8 was engaged but that the ban on assisted suicide was justified.
A · Does not include a right to die
7.Criminal law
Answer: A · A contractual duty to act
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. A contract of employment can create a duty to others who rely on its performance, as in Pittwood, where a gatekeeper left a level crossing gate open.
A · A contractual duty to act
8.Criminal law
Answer: A · Switching off did not break the chain; the original assailants caused the deaths
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Where treatment is given in good faith and the original wound remains an operating cause, the defendant remains the legal cause of death.
A · Switching off did not break the chain; the original assailants caused the deaths
9.EU law
Answer: B · Impose a lump sum or penalty payment on the state
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: EU law. On a second referral by the Commission, the Court can impose a lump sum and/or periodic penalty payments; Article 7 TEU, not Article 260, can lead to suspension of voting rights.
B · Impose a lump sum or penalty payment on the state
10.EU law
Answer: B · The national measures fell within the scope of EU law on VAT and the EU's financial interests
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: EU law. The Court read "implementing EU law" as acting within the scope of EU law, so ne bis in idem under Article 50 of the Charter could apply.
B · The national measures fell within the scope of EU law on VAT and the EU's financial interests