Introduction to Law: cram pack

Formula sheets, the key method steps for every topic and 10 practice problems, with full solutions at the back.

New problemsBack to the course

In the print window, choose “Save as PDF” to keep a copy on your device.

1Practice problems

1.Contract lawMedium

An unusual and onerous term in standard conditions will only be incorporated if:

  1. AIt is printed anywhere in the contract documents, however small the type
  2. BIt appears on the back of a receipt
  3. CIt was fairly and reasonably brought to the other party's attention
  4. DThe other party could have found it online
2.Contract lawHard

A husband who has left his wife signs a note promising to transfer the house to her if she pays off the mortgage. She does. In Merritt v Merritt, the promise was:

  1. AEnforceable only because it was made by deed
  2. BEnforceable, because separated spouses are presumed to intend legal relations
  3. CUnenforceable, because it was a domestic arrangement between husband and wife
  4. DUnenforceable, because she gave no consideration
3.Tort lawMedium

Two chimney sweeps die from fumes while sealing a chimney, despite warnings about the danger. In Roles v Nathan, the occupier was:

  1. ALiable, because the warnings were given orally
  2. BLiable, because occupiers must make premises completely safe for every visitor, including specialists
  3. CNot liable, because specialists can be expected to guard against risks of their trade
  4. DNot liable, because the sweeps were trespassers
4.Tort lawHard

Which statement about the "loss of a chance" doctrine in English medical negligence is correct?

  1. AThe doctrine applies only to economic loss in all cases
  2. BA lost chance of recovery below 50% is generally not compensated (Gregg v Scott)
  3. CAny lost chance is fully compensated
  4. DLost chances are compensated proportionately, as in claims for lost commercial chances
5.Constitutional lawMedium

In Thoburn v Sunderland City Council (the "metric martyrs" case), Laws LJ said that "constitutional statutes":

  1. AMust be approved by referendum
  2. BCannot be repealed at all
  3. CCannot be impliedly repealed, only expressly
  4. DPrevail automatically over all later Acts of Parliament
6.Constitutional lawHard

A woman with a terminal illness asks for a guarantee that her husband will not be prosecuted for helping her die. In Pretty v UK, the European Court of Human Rights held that Article 2:

  1. ADoes not include a right to die
  2. BRequires states to allow assisted suicide
  3. CRequires an immunity for her husband
  4. DWas not engaged by her case at all
7.Criminal lawMedium

A, a lifeguard paid to watch a pool, reads a magazine while a child drowns. A could be liable for an omission because of:

  1. AA contractual duty to act
  2. BHaving created the dangerous situation
  3. CBeing the only person who saw the child
  4. DA special relationship with the child's parents
8.Criminal lawHard

In R v Malcherek and Steel (1981), doctors switched off life-support machines after diagnosing brain death. The court held:

  1. ASwitching off did not break the chain; the original assailants caused the deaths
  2. BThe victims died of natural causes in law
  3. CThe doctors became the legal cause of death by deliberately switching off the machines
  4. DThe defendants were guilty only of attempted murder
9.EU lawMedium

If a member state does not comply with a Court judgment finding an infringement, under Article 260(2) TFEU the Court can:

  1. AExpel the state from the EU
  2. BImpose a lump sum or penalty payment on the state
  3. CSuspend the state's voting rights in the Council
  4. DAnnul the conflicting national law itself
10.EU lawHard

In Åkerberg Fransson (2013), a Swedish fisherman faced tax penalties and criminal proceedings for VAT fraud. The Court held that the Charter applied because:

  1. AThe fisherman was an EU institution employee
  2. BThe national measures fell within the scope of EU law on VAT and the EU's financial interests
  3. CSweden had incorporated the Charter into its constitution
  4. DThe Charter applies to every action of a member state, whether or not it involves EU law in any way

2Solutions

1.Contract law

Answer: C · It was fairly and reasonably brought to the other party's attention

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. The more unusual or onerous a term, the more must be done to draw attention to it. Lord Denning said some clauses would need a red hand pointing to them.

Answer

C · It was fairly and reasonably brought to the other party's attention
2.Contract law

Answer: B · Enforceable, because separated spouses are presumed to intend legal relations

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. When spouses have separated, or are about to, the presumption against legal intention does not apply. Paying off the mortgage was also good consideration.

Answer

B · Enforceable, because separated spouses are presumed to intend legal relations
3.Tort law

Answer: C · Not liable, because specialists can be expected to guard against risks of their trade

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. An occupier may expect a person exercising their calling to appreciate and guard against special risks of it. The warnings also helped discharge the duty.

Answer

C · Not liable, because specialists can be expected to guard against risks of their trade
4.Tort law

Answer: B · A lost chance of recovery below 50% is generally not compensated (Gregg v Scott)

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. In Gregg v Scott the House of Lords refused to award damages for a reduced chance of survival that was already below 50%, keeping the balance of probabilities test.

Answer

B · A lost chance of recovery below 50% is generally not compensated (Gregg v Scott)
5.Constitutional law

Answer: C · Cannot be impliedly repealed, only expressly

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Laws LJ suggested a hierarchy between ordinary and constitutional statutes. A constitutional statute can be repealed only by clear express words, not by implication.

Answer

C · Cannot be impliedly repealed, only expressly
6.Constitutional law

Answer: A · Does not include a right to die

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: European Convention on Human Rights. Article 2 cannot be interpreted as giving the opposite right to choose death. The Court also accepted that Article 8 was engaged but that the ban on assisted suicide was justified.

Answer

A · Does not include a right to die
7.Criminal law

Answer: A · A contractual duty to act

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. A contract of employment can create a duty to others who rely on its performance, as in Pittwood, where a gatekeeper left a level crossing gate open.

Answer

A · A contractual duty to act
8.Criminal law

Answer: A · Switching off did not break the chain; the original assailants caused the deaths

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Where treatment is given in good faith and the original wound remains an operating cause, the defendant remains the legal cause of death.

Answer

A · Switching off did not break the chain; the original assailants caused the deaths
9.EU law

Answer: B · Impose a lump sum or penalty payment on the state

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: EU law. On a second referral by the Commission, the Court can impose a lump sum and/or periodic penalty payments; Article 7 TEU, not Article 260, can lead to suspension of voting rights.

Answer

B · Impose a lump sum or penalty payment on the state
10.EU law

Answer: B · The national measures fell within the scope of EU law on VAT and the EU's financial interests

Why this is the answer

Jurisdiction: EU law. The Court read "implementing EU law" as acting within the scope of EU law, so ne bis in idem under Article 50 of the Charter could apply.

Answer

B · The national measures fell within the scope of EU law on VAT and the EU's financial interests

ExamProblems · examproblems.com/courses/introduction-to-law