1Practice problems
1.Contract lawMedium
A sailor is to be paid only on completing a voyage, but dies part of the way. Under the strict rule applied in Cutter v Powell:
- ANothing was recoverable for the part performed
- BThe ship owner had to pay compensation
- CThe full wages were payable
- DA proportion of the wages was payable
2.Contract lawHard
Under the EU Unfair Terms Directive, a non-negotiated consumer contract term is unfair if:
- AThe consumer did not read it
- BIt benefits the trader in any way, even where the consumer's rights are not significantly affected
- CIt was written in small font
- DContrary to good faith, it causes a significant imbalance to the consumer's detriment
3.Tort lawMedium
Strict liability means a defendant can be liable:
- AOnly for criminal acts
- BWithout proof of fault
- COnly if they acted intentionally
- DOnly if they broke a contract
4.Tort lawHard
After Barker v Corus held that liability under the Fairchild exception was proportionate to each defendant's share of the risk, Parliament responded for mesothelioma cases by:
- AMaking each responsible person liable for the whole damage, under the Compensation Act 2006
- BCreating a state compensation fund to replace tort claims against employers and their insurers entirely
- CAbolishing claims for asbestos disease
- DRequiring proof of "but for" causation in all cases
5.Constitutional lawMedium
Which ground of judicial review applies when a decision-maker ignores a relevant consideration?
- AProcedural impropriety only
- BLegitimate expectation only
- CIllegality
- DNone, because courts never review considerations
6.Constitutional lawHard
In the Urgenda case (2019), the Dutch Supreme Court upheld an order requiring the State to:
- AReduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 25% compared with 1990 by the end of 2020
- BPay damages to every Dutch citizen
- CClose all coal power stations immediately
- DWithdraw from international climate agreements
7.Criminal lawMedium
D buys a substance believing it is heroin and intends to sell it on. In fact it is harmless powder. Following R v Shivpuri, D is:
- AGuilty of the full offence of dealing drugs
- BNot guilty, because the substance was harmless
- CGuilty of attempt, as impossibility is no defence under the 1981 Act
- DNot guilty, because attempting the impossible is no offence under the 1981 Act
8.Criminal lawHard
Conspiracy in English law requires:
- AA written plan
- BThe crime to be actually committed
- CAt least one of the conspirators to have carried out an overt act towards committing the agreed crime
- DAn agreement between two or more people to commit a crime, with intent that it be carried out
9.EU lawMedium
In Van Binsbergen (1974), a Dutch rule requiring legal representatives to reside in the Netherlands was examined. The Court held that:
- AOnly regulations can create rights for service providers
- BThe freedom to provide services is directly effective and residence requirements need justification
- CLegal services are outside the scope of the Treaty
- DMember states may always require residence for professionals involved in the administration of justice
10.EU lawHard
In Aranyosi and Căldăraru (2016), the Court held that a judicial authority executing a European Arrest Warrant:
- AMay postpone surrender if there is a real risk of inhuman or degrading detention conditions for that person
- BMust ask the European Court of Human Rights for permission
- CMust always surrender the person, whatever the prison conditions
- DCan refuse any warrant from a state it distrusts in general
2Solutions
1.Contract law
Answer: A · Nothing was recoverable for the part performed
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Where payment depends on complete performance, partial performance traditionally earns nothing. The harshness is softened by substantial performance and, for frustration, by statute.
A · Nothing was recoverable for the part performed
2.Contract law
Answer: D · Contrary to good faith, it causes a significant imbalance to the consumer's detriment
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: EU law. Directive 93/13 makes non-individually negotiated terms unfair if, contrary to good faith, they cause a significant imbalance in rights and obligations to the consumer's detriment; such terms do not bind the consumer.
D · Contrary to good faith, it causes a significant imbalance to the consumer's detriment
3.Tort law
Answer: B · Without proof of fault
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: general principle, found in most legal systems. In strict liability (for example under the EU Product Liability Directive) the claimant need not prove negligence, only the defect, damage and causation.
B · Without proof of fault
4.Tort law
Answer: A · Making each responsible person liable for the whole damage, under the Compensation Act 2006
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Section 3 makes each defendant in a mesothelioma case jointly and severally liable for the whole damage, with contribution claims between defendants. Barker still applies to other diseases within Fairchild.
A · Making each responsible person liable for the whole damage, under the Compensation Act 2006
5.Constitutional law
Answer: C · Illegality
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Lord Diplock's grounds are illegality, irrationality and procedural impropriety. Taking irrelevant considerations into account, or ignoring relevant ones, is a form of illegality.
6.Constitutional law
Answer: A · Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 25% compared with 1990 by the end of 2020
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: Dutch law. The Supreme Court held that the State's duties under Articles 2 and 8 ECHR to protect against dangerous climate change required at least that reduction target.
A · Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 25% compared with 1990 by the end of 2020
7.Criminal law
Answer: C · Guilty of attempt, as impossibility is no defence under the 1981 Act
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Shivpuri overruled Anderton v Ryan: a person can be guilty of attempting an offence that is impossible on the facts, judged on the facts as they believed them.
C · Guilty of attempt, as impossibility is no defence under the 1981 Act
8.Criminal law
Answer: D · An agreement between two or more people to commit a crime, with intent that it be carried out
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: law of England and Wales. Under the Criminal Law Act 1977, conspiracy is complete once the agreement is made with the necessary intent, even if no further step is taken.
D · An agreement between two or more people to commit a crime, with intent that it be carried out
9.EU law
Answer: B · The freedom to provide services is directly effective and residence requirements need justification
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: EU law. Van Binsbergen held the services provisions directly effective; a residence requirement can only be justified by professional rules in the general interest that are objectively necessary.
B · The freedom to provide services is directly effective and residence requirements need justification
10.EU law
Answer: A · May postpone surrender if there is a real risk of inhuman or degrading detention conditions for that person
Why this is the answer
Jurisdiction: EU law. The executing court must assess, on specific and updated information, whether the individual faces a real risk of ill-treatment and may postpone surrender while that risk remains.
A · May postpone surrender if there is a real risk of inhuman or degrading detention conditions for that person